User talk:Z1933

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Richinstead per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Richinstead. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 09:46, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not true Z1933 (talk) 13:16, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We’re a multiple Wikipedia editor address. Please stop cyberbullying us. Z1933 (talk) 13:18, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple users on an account is against the rules. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 16:33, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple users on one IP address is not. Z1933 (talk) 01:57, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So who is "we"? ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 03:56, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Z1933 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is a real account, and I’ve been nothing but respectful on the talk page. I’m being targeted for political reasons. Please unblock me. Thank you. Z1933 (talk) 02:00, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You haven't given any explanation for why two people are editing the same page with the same device on the same IP address. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:38, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Girth Summit: hello, I was nothing but respectful on the talk page. Please unblock my account. Let me know what I need to do. Thank you. (Z1933 (talk) 02:20, 3 November 2022 (UTC)).[reply]

No, your actual editing record here, not just your comments (although they were bad too), tells us you're NOTHERE and lack the competency to edit here. If you ever return, it should happen under an AP2 topic ban so you won't be able to disrupt talk pages and carry out your political vendettas and whitewashing.

The contribution history of Richinstead, IOW you, is pretty damning. No, stay away from Wikipedia. You don't understand or have any intention of following its PAG. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 06:23, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So, here is your account of what happened, as I understand it: one person, who had an account named Richinstead, managed to get themselves blocked from editing for two weeks. Three days later, once the autoblock on the IP had expired, a different person (you) created this account, and went immediately to an article's talk page to start backing up the arguments made by the first person. Now, what you describe is certainly possible, but if you are asking me to believe that it was a complete coincidence, and that these two people did not communicate with each other about what they were doing, I'm afraid that rather stretches the bounds of credibility. Off-wiki collusion of this sort is what we describe as meatpuppetry; since we have no technical means to determine who is actually behind any particular keyboard, we treat meatpuppets as if they are a single person. So no, I will not be unblocking this account. Girth Summit _(blether) 09:15, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Z1933 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

“You haven't given any explanation for why two people are editing the same page with the same device on the same IP address.” Answer: My lover who has similar interests than I do. They were sad that they we being bullied, and we’re block because of edits to a completely different page!, so I created an account to see the all of the comments. Then went to Doug’s page and added comments to the Talk page only. They are my OWN thoughts. Now please unblock me as that did not violate any Wikipedia rules. Thanks! ;) Z1933 (talk) 15:05, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Perpetually arguing to admins and experienced editors that you've done nothing wrong when you clearly have is a time sink, especially so when the denials include baseless accusations of bullying and "cyber-attacks". As such, so I've revoked your talk page access. You can make a WP:GAB-compliant appeal via WP:UTRS, or find another online platform to vent.Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:56, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I request that both accounts along with there data, history, etc. be deleted permanently from Wikipedia. I want nothing to do with this platform. And I have the right to be forgotten. Z1933 (talk) 15:18, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We can’t delete our accounts because of the block. Z1933 (talk) 15:22, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Help! Z1933 (talk) 15:22, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Accounts are not deleted as destruction of evidence would leave Wikipedia open to future misdeeds by you. People who come here to wage their political battles are unwelcome. You have shown that you can't separate your political POV from your editing. We document what RS say, and that has nothing to do with the personal POV of editors, so never attack editors or sources because of their political biases. As that was a major part of your activities here, your presence was a net negative. Your deceptive block evasion is just another reason to not trust you. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 15:37, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No one asked you. Z1933 (talk) 17:36, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also, Val. You do not engage in politics but you page says “ Donald Trump is a lunatic.” Glad you’re at the helm of making sure people separate their “political POV” from edits. Hahahagaga Z1933 (talk) 17:39, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I want my account deleted because I’m getting cyber attacks now from my fellow tolerant Wikipedia editors. I want nothing to do with this platform. Z1933 (talk) 17:48, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]