User talk:ZH0END

October 2019[edit]

I see that you have created a draft at Draft:Fechner's law, but we already have an article Weber–Fechner law. If you have additional material to contribute, you should add it to the existing article, rather than creating the situation where we have two articles covering the same topic, which would make it difficult for users of the encyclopaedia to find all the relevant information, and difficult for editors of the encyclopaedia to coordinate changes to the two articles. JBW (talk) Formerly JamesBWatson 22:17, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My article is about mathematical aspects of Fechner's law that would not fit in the other article. It is misleading to call it Weber-Fechner law to begin with (and it is clear from my article why), and I very much dislike the way that article is written. --ZH0END (talk) 22:33, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fechner's law (November 2)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GeneralPoxter was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Weber-Fechner Law. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This article is fine, but there is an existing page covering Weber and Fechner laws.

If you believe the two pages should be separated, please follow Wikipedia's splitting guidelines.

But as for the now, this content should be merged with the existing article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fechner's law and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Fechner's law, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GeneralPoxter (talk) 03:03, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ZH0END! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GeneralPoxter (talk) 03:03, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Fechner's law concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Fechner's law, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:27, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Fechner's law[edit]

Hello, ZH0END. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fechner's law".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:10, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]