User talk:Zameh

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:07, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Guide me & help me in getting myself unblocked[edit]

{{unblock|reason=I came to know I was blocked for vandalism. May I know what vandalism I showed?

Had I done it by mistake, kindly unblock me I'll take special care next time.Zameh (talk) 06:21, 1 October 2012 (UTC)}}, Please see [1]. Would you be able to explain for us how this happened in error as your only edit (besides making and editing this unblock request)? - Vianello (Talk) 06:29, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zameh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry, I found some sort of Vandalism by someone else that I thought to be from user itself. I want just one chance, I won't do edits to userpages. Zameh (talk) 06:35, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your request doesn't really make a lot of sense. If aim correctly understanding what you are saying you are claiming that someone else must have made the only edit ever made by this account before it was blocked. If that is your story and you intend to stick to it then I have no choice but to inform you that it is impossible to unblock you as we do not, as a matter of policy, unblock accounts that are compromised. if there is perhaps a more logical, coherent reason for your actions now would be the time to bring it forward. Beeblebrox (talk) 07:10, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zameh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No, I am not trying to say this as this is illogical. I tried to say that there was vandalism on that user page, which I reported as I knew only that but now realizes I must have reverted the vandalism as done by the admin who blocked me. Zameh (talk) 08:41, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is still very unclear. From your edits, it appears that your previous account was blocked. Can you tell us that username? Max Semenik (talk) 09:21, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zameh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

... Continuation of the above four appeals... No, I had no wikipedia account before and no edits Zameh (talk) 6:34 am, Today (UTC−5)

Decline reason:

Confirmed abuse of multiple accounts and open proxies. —DoRD (talk) 12:35, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your primary account has been temporarily blocked by another CheckUser, so any unblock requests should be made there. —DoRD (talk) 12:40, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zameh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

account-vandalism only page states that the first block is temporary but mine has been set to indefinite. I confess it's my blunder to had tagged a userpage instead of reverting the vandalism by an IP. I really apologize for this and ensure no such mistakes in the future and if made, I shall be liable to permanent blockade. But please unblock me, I'll learn with time Wiki Standards but the act (termed as vandalism) by me was a response to vandalism done by an IP. Please do consider. Zameh (talk) 11:49, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline - one request at a time, please —DoRD (talk) 12:35, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

He's saying he saw vandalism by an IP, and instead of reverting the vandalism as he is admitting would have been the right course of action, he mistakenly added the {{db-vandalism}} tag, a mistake for which he was blocked indefinitely. Clear now? --Closedmouth (talk) 12:08, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Closedmouth for understanding me. I am not an advanced user and I have been charged with multiple aacounts abuse, in fact this is my first and single account.--Zameh (talk) 14:00, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Really? It's odd that you seem to have such difficulty making yourself understood, and yet you very first edit was to add a properly formatted deletion tag to another user's page. A user who just happened to have, around the same time, left several notices and warnings on the talk page of the very user that a checkuser says is actually you as well. Experience has taught is to be wary of such coincidences. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:54, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Beeblebrox I searched for vandalism & its deletion and on a wiki page I found the tag. I merely copied it to the userpage. I have no personal conflict with the user. I had written very simply and it is not I who couldn't make you understand, its you people who couldn't got it otherwise Closedmouth could never understand. --Zameh (talk) 18:07, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Acceptance, Shame, and Sincere Apology[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zameh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I confess that the block on me is appropriate for my blunder. I am shamed over it for unable to do editing. I present my sincere request for forgiveness for the grievance. Kindly unblock me for I assure you of no such bungle in the future and I realize such deeds are nothing but merely vandalism. Zameh (talk) 15:19, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I have reviewed your edits and your comments here on this talk page, and I can find no reason to believe that unblocking you would be likely to make the encyclopedia better. I see that your block at your original account, User_talk:Pmsamee, will expire in a week; please feel free to edit using that account when your block expires. Since there isn't any further reason to use this account, I'll help by disabling this talk page. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 15:39, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.