User talk:Zas2000

November 2010

Your addition to File:Zaporozhie Khortitsa map.jpg. has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Picture had "Map data (c) Geocentre Consultina" on it, therefore not "I created this work entirely by myself" Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:34, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Zaporozhye

So that you and User:Taivo don't edit war over the article on Zaporozhye, I have made a compromise edit incorporating elements of what both of you want. I have also created redirects so that links are not in red.

Please note that in England:

Earth = name of the planet = Earth
earth = substance on the ground = Soil

So making wood-earth fortifications makes perfect sense in English.--Toddy1 (talk) 17:04, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly you are right, but most of the people of Earth planet use now days US English

--Zas2000 (talk) 18:26, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Since you are not a native speaker of English, please do not try to correct the English editing of those who are. In US English, "wood-earth" is perfectly acceptable and is, indeed, the preferred way to state this. Also your continued reversions are not welcome. If you make a change and one of us corrects your English, do NOT revert that change. --Taivo (talk) 22:13, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your suggestions, but first I need to make sure that you are a native speaker, now I'm not sure about that yet

I'll edit all that is wrong with my point of view

--Zas2000 (talk) 22:20, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Zaporozhye edit war

We need to resolve the edit war over the article on on Zaporozhye between Taivo and Zas2000. I have gone through your differences sentence by sentence, and created a structure where you can explain them in a way that a mediator can understand. Please can you add comments, citations, etc. to Talk:Zaporizhia#Please_can_we_stop_this_edit_warring_and_make_a_compromise.--Toddy1 (talk) 06:58, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four halfwidth tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 14:45, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

18 September 1943

What is the source for the claim that Hitler visited HQ Army Group South on 18 September 1943? It is not mentioned by von Manstein in his book Lost Victories. On the contrary, that book says the von Manstein had a meeting with Hitler on 15 September, and then returned to his headquarters (i.e. the meeting was not at HQ Army Group South.

Note that HQ Army Group South moved from Zaporozhe in mid-September 1943.--Toddy1 (talk) 12:49, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Zaporizhia - October 1943

What are the sources for the following statements?

The Soviet Southwestern Front, commanded by Army General Rodion Malinovsky, attacked in mid-October
and managed to surprise a large German force in Zaporizhia
and captured it.

read this for beginning and study references in there http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rodion_Malinovsky --zas2000 (talk) 13:57, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rodion_Malinovsky#Stalingrad_and_Ukrainian_Front has no citations at all.--Toddy1 (talk) 14:02, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The first Red Army tank to enter the city was commanded by Lieutenant Yatsenko;
he and his crew were killed in the battle for the city;
the grateful dwellers still keep the memory of these soldiers.

Read this and references in there:

http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%AF%D1%86%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%BE,_%D0%9D%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B9_%D0%9B%D0%B0%D0%B2%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%82%D1%8C%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87

The retreating Germans blew up, looted all in the city (DnieproGES, plants, people)

--Toddy1 (talk) 13:25, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Read this http://misto.zp.ua/article/articles553.html,

Nuremberg Manstein case and his book Lost Victories. Manstein got 15 years in prison for what he did on the occupied Ukraine

http://www.zabor.zp.ua/zaporozhye/istoria/voina_v_zaporozhye.htm --zas2000 (talk) 13:57, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - this is a useful source.--Toddy1 (talk) 14:06, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Award

		Ukraine Barnstar
		I give you this Ukraine Barnstar for improving the Zaporizhia article the past weeks! Even though we (seem) to look different at things, that doesn't mean I am not happy with your behaviour on wikipedia! — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 21:41, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Linking to Russian wikipedia articles

I have remembered how to do wikilinks to Russian language wikipedia. For example: Lieutenant Yatsenko.--Toddy1 (talk) 17:17, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%AF%D1%86%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%BE,_%D0%9D%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B9_%D0%9B%D0%B0%D0%B2%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%82%D1%8C%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87

--zas2000 (talk) 17:23, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Яценко,_Николай_Лаврентьевич

The recipe is simple: firstly copy the Latin part of the address -> paste it. secondly do the same with the Cyrillic part.--zas2000 (talk) 18:04, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You bad understand. [[:ru:Яценко, Николай Лаврентьевич]] = ru:Яценко, Николай Лаврентьевич

To make it work, need type :ru: before Russian wikipedia article name.

No need for http://....--Toddy1 (talk) 18:19, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BeforeDneproGES.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BeforeDneproGES.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:42, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Manstein headquaters in Zaporozhie.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Manstein headquaters in Zaporozhie.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:18, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dnieper Hydroelectric Station

If you think that Wikipedia should call the hydro-electric dam at Zaporozhye: DneproGES instead of DniproHES, the place to make the change is the article on the Dnieper Hydroelectric Station. If you can make the change, and have it stick, then it will be fine to use that spelling in the article on Zaporozhye.

Having the article on Zaporozhye call it DneproGES and the article on the on the dam call it DniproHES is confusing for English speaking readers of Wikipedia.

Incidentally, in normal English these things are called "hydro-electric dams", though the term "hydroelectric power station" is also acceptable. "Hydroelectric station" is not normal English. Whether you write "hydro-electric" or "hydroelectric" is a matter of choice; both are acceptable; I believe "hydro-electric" is more normal.

A quick search reveals the following frequency on Google for things written in English:

Dnipro HES - 283,000 (however there were very many false positives with this)
DneproGES - 7,160
DniproGES - 422
DniproHES - 340
DneproHES - 58

(In each case, I went to the last item found - as the Google algorithms give a more accurate count if you do this.)

--Toddy1 (talk) 06:05, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Something should be chosen. Dam has to be called "The DneproGES". The DneproGES has birth certificate named in it as "Днепровская Гидро-Электрическая Станция "(ДнепроГЭС)- DneproGES, see [1] and [2]

Yandex.ru says :

DneproGES - 4119
DniproGES - 1147
DniproHES - 1256
DneproHES - 23
Dnipro HES - 1655

--zas2000 (talk) 12:18, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The answer is that you need to persuade people on Talk:Dnieper Hydroelectric Station, and then change that article.--Toddy1 (talk) 13:00, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

These two towers set a straight line of the central street of the district

What do you mean by this statement?--Toddy1 (talk) 06:12, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is the figure of speech, bird's language that is used some journalists in their articles about art - To many nice and pleasant sounds and almost no meaning. In this particular sentence, it means that the central avenue of very straight, and two tall towers just point to it. Nothing more.

--zas2000 (talk) 13:05, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dnieper Hydroelectric Station

The article used to say that it "is the largest hydroelectric power station in Ukraine and was the largest in Europe at the time of its construction. It is situated on the Dnieper River in Zaporizhzhia."

Those are two claims to notability:

largest hydroelectric power station in Ukraine
was the largest in Europe at the time of its construction

The article now says that it "is the largest hydroelectric power station on the Dnieper River in Zaporizhia".

Are there other hydroelectric power stations on the Dnieper in Zaporizhia?

Are you saying that it is not true that it is the largest hydroelectric power station in Ukraine?

Are you saying that it is not true that it was the largest in Europe at the time of its construction? --Toddy1 (talk) 21:27, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Now the article abstract says: "The Dnieper Hydroelectric Station is the largest hydroelectric power station on the Dnieper River, placed in Zaporizhia, Ukraine".

On your Are you saying that it is not true that it was the largest in Europe at the time of its construction? This information should be placed in the body of the article. In there one might give some additional information - how long it was the largest power station, which station beat it, what was the winner power and who build and so on.

Again: The abstract is not the best place for this kind of information. For me, much better to add in the abstract, that the station was built on desert land in the countryside to aggravate Ukrainian industrialization --zas2000 (talk) 22:05, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Sebastopol-1854.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Sebastopol-1854.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:11, 17 December 2011 (UTC) k;k[reply]

" Ferry+ Kichkas bridge"

To Toddy1: В результате вашего редактирования пропала интересная и полезная информация о Кичкаской переправе:

Мост назван по имени древнейшей переправы, существовавшей со скифских времен
Мост построили сразу после последнего из порогов
Кичкаский мост был первым железнодорожным мостом в нижнем течении Днепра и находился в 10-14 км от города, т.е находился вне городской черты
Причем здесь коммунистическая революция? Революция была через десять лет после окончания строительства моста, с какой целью вы о ней пишите?
Мост связал Никопольское железно-никилевое местрождение с Донецким углем. --zas2000 (talk) 03:08, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Warning April 2012

You made an edit after you clearly failed to reach consensus at the talk page of the article. I had to revert it. Please next time wait until consensus is reached. In the meanwhile, you may want to read WP:CONSENSUS. If you continue to ignore this policy, your account may be blocked from editing. Thank you for understanding.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:16, 21 April 2013 (UT

I've made request to my opponent, he keeps silence, which understand as we got consensus. What is wrong with it?--zas2000 (talk) 13:25, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, it is not consensus. Please read the policy. In addition, he is absent on weekends.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:36, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to remind you our last "consensus" on the Branch of Lebedev Instute. You also kept silence and till now I don't know did we get consensus or not?--zas2000 (talk) 13:43, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I explicitly said I do not object; concerning the notability, this is a secondary point, and I am unwilling to invest any time in it as it is not going to result in any change. Note that I was employed in Troitsk for five years, and it is unlikely that this research would yield anything interesting for me.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:46, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am employed in Troitsk for 40 years--zas2000 (talk) 13:51, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Then how comes that you do not know that the Lebedev Institute is located in Moscow?--Ymblanter (talk) 13:55, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"this research would yield anything interesting for me."

We are discussing how long should wait the response of my opponents?--zas2000 (talk) 14:00, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am not quite sure what we are discussing. I gave you a warning that the next time you might be blocked, or at least reported to ANI. Apparently, you wanted to discuss smth else, but I am generally not so much interested in an unstructured discussion. May be I should quit now.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:03, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sure--zas2000 (talk) 14:07, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Zaporizhia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nikopol (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Zas2000. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]