User talk:Zibart
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/cf/Appointment_green.svg/48px-Appointment_green.svg.png)
Zibart (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
My school IP has been blocked for reasons I am not specifically aware of but can easily imagine. As a result I am unable to edit while at school. Is it possible to make it so that I can edit from shool? I have never vandalised or intentionally damaged Wikipedia. I used o be able to edit whn my school was blocked but I can no longer do this.
Accept reason:
Granting IPBE, which will fulfill your request. — Daniel Case (talk) 14:27, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
IP block exempt
[edit]I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking. This will allow you to edit through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.
Please read the page Wikipedia:IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions.
Note in particular that you are not permitted to use this newly-granted right to edit Wikipedia via anonymous proxies, or disruptively. If you do, or there is a serious concern of abuse, then the right may be removed by any administrator.
Appropriate usage and compliance with the policy may be checked periodically, due to the nature of block exemption, and block exemption will be removed when no longer needed (for example, when the block it is related to expires).
I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption. Daniel Case (talk) 14:27, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
STiki
[edit]Here is the link to STiki (the anti-vandalism tool): WP:STiki User Talk:W.D. 12:28, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks I have downloaded it.
Welcome to STiki!
[edit]
Hello, Zibart, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Here are some pages which are a little more fun:
We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and ÐℬigXЯaɣ 08:19, 25 May 2012 (UTC) |
![]() |
The whole page was a mess: the organization random; the list of titles held by various people with the name, as if that made them titles belonging to the whole family, or worse, to everyone with the surname is flawed; the genealogy and history was mostly bogus (and just listed dozens of names without context); the list of people with the surname included more non-notable individuals than notable ones; the sources were so vague as to be worthless and it was not written in coherent English - this is not how to put together a Wikipedia page. If that means it needs to be pared down to the bare essentials, then so be it. It isn't vandalism to clean up a page by getting rid of the nonsense, even if that means you get rid of most of the page. Agricolae (talk) 16:36, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
- Just as an added note, it is unlikely that an editor with more than 5 years of experience and approaching 7000 edits is going to be a vandal, nor is an edit with a detailed edit summary naming the problems being addressed likely to be vandalism. I note that another of your edits reverted the correction of a grammatical faux pas (you never want to begin a sentence with a number in digital form), with no further explanation than that it was a good-faith edit reverted with the STiki tool. Tools are good ways to make complex tasks easier, but you still need to evaluate things for yourself and there is just as much burden on you as an editor to provide a meaningful edit summary on good-faith reverts. Agricolae (talk) 18:46, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
Adopt-A-User
[edit]Hi there, I have noticed you have started using STiki, it is very good for fighting vandalism.
One thing else you may be interested in also is the adopt-a-user program. This would enable you to become an even more experienced editor, I got 'Adopted' by Bmusician and trust me, I am a lot more experienced now than I was before adoption, so if you want to, then I would suggest asking Bmusician if he will adopt you. Basically it is just like being shown how to become a more experienced editor, and maybe one day, an sysop (admin). Thanks User Talk:W.D. 16:36, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
Adoption
[edit]Hello Zibart! Thank you for showing an interest in joining my adoption program! I'll be happy to adopt you because I enjoy working with others – especially to help them become a better editor on Wikipedia!
Take a look at my edit history; I usually work at Articles for Deletion, Articles for Creation, in new page patrolling, and in vandalism-fighting. I have been an editor on Wikipedia for a year, and have made over 15,000 edits to the encyclopedia.
I'm usually available on Wikipedia from 0:00 - 5:00 and occasionally from 12:00-16:00 (all times UTC). I travel frequently, usually on business trips around the world. I'm so young, yet so busy.
If I adopt you, I promise I will provide you with the most friendly, easy, and convenient adoption service through my adoption school. If you think I am the right adopter for you, we shall get started now! →Bmusician 04:52, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
- Great lets begin Zibart (talk) 12:44, 28 May 2012 (UTC).
A barnstar for you!
[edit]![]() |
The Editor's Barnstar |
For your over 350 edits Calu2000 (talk) 09:27, 26 May 2012 (UTC) |
Welcome to Bmusician's adoption school!
[edit]Welcome!
You are now a student at my adoption school. Your official adoption page is located at User:Bmusician/Adoption/Zibart.
In your first assignment (which I have already assigned to you) you will learn about the five pillars. Read the lesson carefully. After you're done reading the lesson, you will take a test about the lesson. You must answer all of the questions in the test adequately in order to move on to the next assignment.
After you've completed all required assignments, you will then take a final examination. If you pass the examination, you are permitted to either continue to study at the adoption school, or "graduate" from the school. (We'll talk about that when that time actually comes.) If you fail, however, you must stay at the adoption school until you finally pass an exam. Please note that you may leave the school at any time without graduating, but that means that you won't be awarded the "special barnstar" I give to my graduate students.
That's it; again I welcome you to my adoption school! Please leave me a message on my talk page if you have any questions regarding the school. →Bmusician 13:13, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Template talk:Moons of dwarf planets
[edit]Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Moons of dwarf planets. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 11:15, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
An award for you!
[edit]![]() |
Award of First Success | |
Congratulations on completing your first adoption assignment. There are still many more assignments in which you'll have to complete, so keep working hard! →Bmusician 06:32, 31 May 2012 (UTC) |
Dear Zibart,
A new adoption assignment has been assigned to you. Please view the assignment on your adoption page and complete it as soon as you can, but remember to take your time. If you no longer wish to receive these notifications, please click here to turn them off.
→Bmusician 06:32, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Android version history
[edit]Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Android version history. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 12:15, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Blekko
[edit]Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Blekko. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 13:20, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Carnegie Mellon School of Computer Science
[edit]Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Carnegie Mellon School of Computer Science. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 14:15, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
Adoption
[edit]I regret to tell you that I will no longer be active on Wikipedia, and due to that, I can no longer be your mentor. If you wish to continue to be under mentorship, please find someone else at Wikipedia:Adopt-a-user/Adoptee's Area/Adopters. Regards, →Bmusician 07:53, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
- I have stated that I will not see any of Bmusician's adoptees go without. Since his adoption course was based upon mine, I am in a unique position to carry it on. If you would like me to do so, please do let me know. WormTT(talk) 12:42, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
Followup RFC to WP:RFC/AAT now in community feedback phase
[edit]Hello. As a participant in Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Abortion article titles, you may wish to register an opinion on its followup RFC, Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Abortion advocacy movement coverage, which is now in its community feedback phase. Please note that WP:RFC/AAMC is not simply a repeat of WP:RFC/AAT, and is attempting to achieve better results by asking a more narrowly-focused, policy-based question of the community. Assumptions based on the previous RFC should be discarded before participation, particularly the assumption that Wikipedia has or inherently needs to have articles covering generalized perspective on each side of abortion advocacy, and that what we are trying to do is come up with labels for that. Thanks! —chaos5023 20:34, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Start a discussion with Zibart
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. Start a new discussion to connect and collaborate with Zibart. What you say here will be public for others to see.