User talk:Zipity11

Hello, Zipity11! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Crowsnest (talk) 11:11, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Sally Mann

Hello Zipity11. You are doing a great job on the Sally Mann article! But, since it appears to me that you are closely related to her, there is the risk of a conflict of interest, see WP:COI. If there is a conflict of interest: as long as you stay editing, as you do now, with a neutral point of view (see WP:NPOV), there are no problems. That requires some self reflection on the edits you want to make. If you think an edit may be controversial, you can ask at the article's talk page somebody else to make that edit, or ask me. Happy editing, Crowsnest (talk) 14:42, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Crowsnest...I do have a major edit on Sally Mann that I would like to submit, and, I like you, am concerned about maintaining a NPOV, although I think I have done a good job of it. I would like to run it by you first. Can I do this by putting it on my users page, or in my sandbox? Is this even the right place to be asking you this question? Thanks for offering to be available for advice! ~ ~ ~ ~

Hi Zipity11. You can just put it in your sandbox. I will have a look at it today or tomorrow. Best regards, Crowsnest (talk) 18:26, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zipity11. The following categories do not exist, so I cannot add Sally Mann to them:

Further, since she is already in the corresponding "photographers" categories, which are sub-categories of the "artists" ones, I think it is overdone (see WP:CAT) to put her also in these cat's:

Hope this agrees with your intentions. Regards, Crowsnest (talk) 14:40, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Crowsnest...

I wondered...

I was using Annie Liebovitz as a prototype, and she had those categories (well, some of them). I just assumed that the more categories, the easier it would be to find and cross reference a person.

Categories removed.

Major edit to be posted soon. Don't leave me....

Zipity11 (talk) 14:52, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I will take a look at Annie Liebovitz. Anyhow, I added 2 cat's. Please leave a message here if you think the material is ready for inclusion. Bye, Crowsnest (talk) 14:56, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Crownest...

It's ready. I think I did a pretty good job in keeping a NPOV. See what you think.

Zipity11 (talk) 16:24, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zipity11. That is quite a rewrite. Looks to be well referenced, and expanded. I will have a look at it this weekend. Best regards, Crowsnest (talk) 17:08, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Still need to have a thorough look at the new page. I will give my impression tomorrow. -- Crowsnest (talk) 20:29, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Crowsnest...

I am glad to have had these few days: I have made several small edits to it, but it feels better. Zipity11 (talk) 11:23, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Zipity11, I will put comments on the talk page of your sandbox. -- Crowsnest (talk) 11:50, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bedrock Gardens

Hi Zipity11. I see Bedrock Gardens has made the transition to a fully-fledged article. Congratulations!

I left some comments for you at User talk:Zipity11/Alternative Sandbox but you probably haven't seen them. Maybe the article was already in article-space by the time I left my comments.

Regards. Dolphin51 (talk) 05:49, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Robert S. Munger, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Winton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Robert S. Munger

Hello Zipity11! Wondered if you could help resolve some link rot on the Robert S. Munger article. I am unable to get the external link Talk given by Edward Lee Norton to work. Appears you created the link in 2019. Perhaps you know of another source for this talk? Condensinguponitself (talk) 02:10, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]