User talk:Zomgrose

Welcome!

Hello, Zomgrose, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! -🐦Do☭torWho42 (⭐) 06:44, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Communication

Hi, I see that you make extensive use of the edit summary feature, which is mostly a good thing, but you have made virtually no talk page comments since you joined WP. Engagement is important. For example, you currently have an issue with List of biggest box-office bombs. It would be preferable, and likely productive, if you started a thread on that article's talk page to discuss your issue. You can propose the changes you wish to made, along with your reasons and sourcing in support of doing so. This is especially important to do once you've been reverted, due to the WP:BRD editing policy. Thank you for your cooperation. - wolf 05:41, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at List of biggest box-office bombs. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. - wolf 06:14, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. - wolf 08:04, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Zomgrose (talk) 03:14, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at List of biggest box-office bombs

Hello Zomgrose. You've been warned for edit warring on this article. You are risking a block if you revert again before getting a consensus in your favor on the talk page. It has been noted that you don't make use of talk pages. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 02:52, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My List of Box Office Bombs Edit

I made the changes because it was a contradiction as to why Waterworld got a pass. I also considered removing Tenet as well. The New Mutants is also not considered a bomb? Zomgrose (talk) 03:13, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's fine for you to make these arguments on the talk page. Then wait and see if others agree with you. EdJohnston (talk) 03:14, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Zomgrose (talk) 03:19, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]