User talk:Zuxtra

July 2021

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of name and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Ashleyyoursmile (talk) 17:32, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zuxtra (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

don't need to advertise, we just want to keep a log in the public domain of our intellectual properties

Decline reason:

Wikipedia isn't in the public domain, nor is it suitable for this sort of thing. Yamla (talk) 17:50, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What I understand, wikipedia is the father of open block chain , that makes it a public domain. Kindly enlighten me on why it's not a public domain?

I find information about many companies here along with product details & launch dates Zuxtra (talk) 18:00, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You understand incorrectly. Wikipedia has nothing to do with the block chain. You can read more about block chains at Block chain. Even if Wikipedia was somehow on a block chain, that would not make it public domain. You can read more about public domain at Public domain. Wikipedia content, by contrast, is not released to the public domain but instead remains protected by copyright. Copyright is a huge subject area; WP:COPYRIGHT might be a good place to start. Also, WP:FREESPEECH, as I think you are implying you have a right to put content here, which you most certainly don't. --Yamla (talk) 19:27, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is a matter of huge debate, however I know what blockchain, public domain & copyright means . Let's not get into all these but I certainly had got wrong impression about your user rights. It would be a great help if you can point out the rules of putting my start-up information on your platform if at all permitted. Zuxtra (talk) 19:37, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid we aren't interested in what a start-up wishes to say about itself. And certainly Wikipedia isn't the place to document that startup's inventions. If this is your only goal here, this is the end of the line. You should use your own website to post that information. If instead you wish to write about subjects for which you have no conflict of interest, you'll want to make a new unblock request. Demonstrate you understand the policies I've linked to and tell us what you plan to write about instead. --Yamla (talk) 19:52, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Summary of important points

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia - a general reference about topics that are considered notable, as defined in Wikipedia's notability criteria.
Just because something exists (e.g. a person, a thing, a company, a concept) does not automatically mean it's notable.
In the case of a company, the refined notability criteria for companies determines whether or not a company is deserving of an article.
We require a company to already have significant coverage from multiple reliable and independent sources to satisfy the notability criteria. Lacking coverage of sufficient quantity and quality means that the company is not worthy of inclusion.
Even if a company has the potential to become notable, no one can predict the future. Possible future notability has no effect on present-day notability. Subjects must be already notable to be included.
We have little interest in what a company's representatives want to say about it. Writing about your own company is a conflict of interest (COI), which impairs your ability to judge its notability and write from the required neutral point of view. COI editors - even those with good intentions - can inadvertently write in a promotional tone without even realizing it.
Should your company become notable enough at some point to merit a Wikipedia article, you will not have any right of ownership or control over its content. Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy will ensure that both positive and negative coverage will be included, provided it is reliably sourced, neutrally worded and presented with proper balance.

--Drm310 🍁 (talk) 20:47, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]