User talk:Zwirnie

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Born in the U.S.A. Tour may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

]. "[[Man at the Top (song)|Man at the Top]]" was played for the second and final time on the tour (after premiering one month earlier at the [[Alpine Valley Music Theatre]], before it reappeared

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:44, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited A League of Their Own (Australian game show), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Steven Bradbury (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

High Hopes Tour

Thanks for pitching in on the Springsteen tour article and catching some of my mess-ups in the citations as I tried to clean it up. I don't even try to edit it using my iPad because it's too hard to get a clean edit that way, but even with my full-size keyboard and mouse I sometimes get lost in the citations. I've tried in the past to keep Springsteen tour-related articles free of fanzine-style trivia, but it's a losing effort because one editor in particular feels the need to add every minute detail about every appearance Springsteen makes (and he usually duplicates a lot of it in both the tour article and the biographical article). Stuff like the playing of "Free Nelson Mandela" or the tribute to Pete Seeger is worth mentioning, but I don't think an encyclopedia needs to mention that a particular song was dropped from the setlist for the first time in two years or that a cover song was played for the first time since 1975 (the lone exception would be back in 1984 when "Rosalita," which was the one sure thing you'd always hear, was dropped for the first time at the Tacoma show). I don't think most people coming to Wikipedia for information on a concert tour will benefit from that level of detail nor have any interest in it, and the die-hards who do enjoy that information already know where to find it on sites like Backstreets.com. Problem is, trying to keep up with editing out the excessive detail is just a losing effort. The editor in question also doesn't have a great grasp of punctuation and uses a lot of run-on sentences. Other people have tried to discuss the "excessive detail" matter with him on his talk page, but they've gotten nowhere. (He once cited a Greasy Lake page that required a password for access and then argued with me when I said it wasn't a reliable source.) So for what it's worth, I've been thinking I may just wait a day or two after each show, let him put in whatever he wants, then edit it down.

Incidentally, the funny thing is, I haven't seen anything at all from Springsteen or his management referring to the tour as the "High Hopes Tour." The only place I've seen that so far, aside from here, was at Greasy Lake when I went there this morning to get the language I used in saying they're not a reliable source. On the other hand, since I unfortunately don't have the money to fly to South Africa or Australia for the concerts, I have no idea what the tour merchandise might say. I thought about reverting the article move and putting it back at "Bruce Springsteen 2014 Tour," but ultimately I thought it was more trouble than it's worth and I felt that regardless of what the Springsteen organization might call the tour, the odds are everyone will call it the "High Hopes Tour" anyway just to distinguish it.

Anyway, nothing too important in the above comments, but I just wanted to say thanks for pitching in because it tells me I'm not the only person keeping an eye on this stuff. 1995hoo (talk) 16:45, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply on my talk page. I appreciate it because at times as I've been engaging in large-scale revisions I've found myself wondering if I'll come across as heavy-handed or as having it in for that one particular user. I know he's enthusiastic about the topic and thus probably means well such that it's just a case of not having a sense of what's important and what isn't. But I also know that when one person (in this case me) is constantly coming along a day later and changing things it can come across the wrong way. So I appreciate it that someone else is on board. Cheers! 1995hoo (talk) 17:19, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the Wrecking Ball Tour, I debated whether to leave in the 1978 intro to "Prove It All Night," but I deleted it because I thought the average reader would have no idea what it means and would never likely have heard it unless that person had attended a concert where it was played. Put differently, the only recordings documenting that at the moment are all bootlegs. At the most recent show I attended (Nationals Park on 2012-09-14), he opened the show with that version of "Prove It." I think I was the only person in my section or the surrounding ones who knew what was going on—it was apparent nobody else had heard it. I have to say it was a strange way to start the show for precisely that reason. That's why I ultimately took it out, but I could certainly see an argument for leaving it in if it's written so as to explain to the casual reader that Springsteen played it that way years ago, fans had long wished to hear it again, and out of the blue it was back. In other words, I guess we have to explain why that particular rendition is significant, whereas the other editor we've been discussing seems to assume the reader is familiar with the topic (I prefer to start from the opposite assumption). Frankly, I'm not sure how best to approach it, though I guess maybe looking back to the article about the 1978 tour might be a good starting point.

As I reflect on it, I think I deleted the mention of how "My City of Ruins" included the brief rap about "ghosts." When I have time I will try to add that back in. It's relevant because it recognized Danny Federici. The Big Man's death gets all the attention, but Federici was an important part of the band and omitting the "ghosts" thing might suggest Springsteen was overlooking him. I'll try to get around to it later today or tomorrow. 1995hoo (talk) 17:40, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Following up on this, I thought you might be interested in two comments, one that was left on my talk page this morning and my lengthy response to it. 1995hoo (talk) 14:53, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Noticed the U.S. tour dates were removed because you said they were rumors...the Nasville media is reporting on the show there and a photo was taken at the NC arena confirming the show there. Both had links provided. Springsteen hasn't announced them (the Nashville article stated an announcement was expected Monday or Tuesday on full tour dates) but both venues appear to be promoting the shows.

Nashville date: http://www.nashvillescene.com/nashvillecream/archives/2014/02/08/bruce-springsteen-and-the-e-street-band-to-play-bridgestone-arena-april-17
North Carolina date (photo taken at arena): http://s842.photobucket.com/user/Heustis1/media/BruceConcert_zps9d6cc3c7.jpg.html

Jason1978 (talk) 09:45, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, SriLankan Airlines fleet

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, SriLankan Airlines fleet. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – SriLankan Airlines. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at SriLankan Airlines – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. SideshowBob7 (talk) 20:26, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Vistara, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jetstreamer ^Talk 14:54, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Zwirnie. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Zwirnie. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Zwirnie. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:07, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]