Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rick Newnham

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. So Why 09:30, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rick Newnham[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Vanity page for an economist, sourced only to connected sources. Puffed up list of accomplishments; Global Shaper, Ambassador for Australia Day, Young Western Australian of the Year (Recognises the personal and professional endeavours of a young person aged 18 – 25 years who has fostered a significant positive change in their life and the lives of others in the community.), Saïd Business School prize. Non of these are notable, or have received attention in independent, reliable sources Mduvekot (talk) 11:12, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. FITINDIA 11:25, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. FITINDIA 11:25, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What about this: People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published[4] secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other,[5] and independent of the subject.[6]

View articles clearly shows it is within scope. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Averagejoe2017 (talk • contribs) 11:19, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete:per nom Sulaimandaud (talk) 07:05, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 12:06, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- a CV on an nn individual; "Chief Economist of the Chamber of Commerce" is hardly a claim to notability. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:29, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 09:11, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Wikipedia is not a resume. The article doesn't point to any distinctions or achievements that would show notability, it's basically just a CV.PohranicniStraze (talk) 13:45, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete looks like it should be on linkedin. Just a CV. I think there is sufficient secondary sources for WP:NEXIST, but this article needs to start again WP:TNT. Aoziwe (talk) 14:00, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.