Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liberty Alliance LLC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:06, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Liberty Alliance LLC[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem to meet WP:NCORP, only one independent and significant coverage source, can't find other significant coverage. AlexandraAVX (talk) 15:03, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Conservatism, Christianity, Websites, and United States of America. AlexandraAVX (talk) 15:03, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:21, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep GNG is met with existing coverage, SNG compliance is optional. Jclemens (talk) 00:40, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The only independent significant coverage I can see is the Ingersoll article, the only other secondary source is the Inc. 5000, which seems to be very trivial (only a few sentences). I'd welcome a discussion on if it's a similar situation to the Fortune 500 or Michelin guide in NCORP, but at face value it's trivial. AlexandraAVX (talk) 15:19, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Was unable to find a reason for this company belonging on the encyclopedia in my searches. I believe that a lot more SIG should be provided in order for me to change my opinion and fulfill the Heymann Standard. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 16:39, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Reuters reported in 2019 that Brandon Vallorani had sold the company. The website in the article (https://www.libertyalliance.com/) is no longer correct - that company " addresses the challenges of the next-generation battlespace" There is different organization (https://libertyallianceusa.com/) that is based in Kansas City and is owned by Todd Graves. The article is about the organization discussed in Ingersoll - and that is certainly significant coverage in a reliable source, so we are halfway to satisfying GNG. St Anselm (talk) 17:31, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 19:58, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 21:22, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I've added coverage from this article and others I found through my university to the article. I believe GNG is met. Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 21:43, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Sufficient coverage and meets GNG in my honest opinion. Ekdalian (talk) 12:56, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.