Wikipedia:Citizenship and nationality

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Note: The following paragraph describes the options that would be available in {{Infobox person}} should this proposal be accepted by the community. Presently, the template provides only a "nationality" field, not both a "nationality" and a "citizenship".

Citizenship and nationality are two options in the {{Infobox person}} template which, though often related, are distinct concepts with different meanings. The purpose of this guideline is to provide editors with clear instructions that explain the differences between nationality and citizenship, why they are sometimes mistakenly used as synonyms, and how to decide whether either is appropriate for use in a given circumstance.

Definitions[edit]

Citizenship is a legal status in a political institution such as a city or a state. The relationship between a citizen and the institution that confers this status is formal, and in contemporary liberal-democratic models includes both a set of rights that the citizen possesses by virtue of this relationship, and a set of obligations or duties that they owe to that institution and their fellow citizens in return.

Nationality, on the other hand, denotes informal membership in or identification with a particular nation (which is not a synonym for country or state).[1] While nationality is sometimes conferred as a legal status (see below), it and nations are properly understood as social categories, characterised by at least a common language, culture and territory, and sometimes also by a common religious faith and a purportedly shared ancestry.

People (ethnic group) is the plural of persons who have common origin, common and distinctive culture, common myths and symbols, traditions and common laws and customs for members. In other words the people is cultural and biological community.

Relationship[edit]

While the terms "citizenship" and "nationality" are sometimes used interchangeably, this is for political purposes rather than because there is no difference between the two. The most familiar instance of this is the use of "nationality" to denote state citizenship (as in nationality law). This is common practice for many states, under the assumption that because they are supposed to be "nation-states" (meaning that the boundaries of the nation and the state coincide), making a distinction is unnecessary – all citizens are also nationals.

In reality, the majority of contemporary states are multi-national, and less than ten per cent can be accurately described as nation-states.[1] Many, however, still characterise themselves this way because of the political legitimacy that nation-statehood is thought to provide. The reasons for this are complex, but can be summarised as the result of the increased importance of norms of democratic governance and national self-determination in both domestic and "international"[2] politics since at least the Treaty of Versailles that ended the First World War.[3]

Examples[edit]

An obvious example of when citizenship and nationality will differ is naturalization through immigration.[4] In this circumstance a person may be required to renounce their previous citizenship(s) (depending on the laws of both the original and receiving states), but this does not imply that they have renounced their previous nationalities as well. For example, an immigrant from Germany to the United States of America may apply for and receive American citizenship, but it is unlikely that she or anyone else would then say that she was no longer "German" in any sense, despite the fact that in most circumstances Germany requires its emigrants to renounce their German citizenship before adopting another.[5]

Multinational states provide another example. While many citizens of Canada and the United Kingdom, for instance, see Canada or the United Kingdom as their respective nations, a significant proportion of them do not (or, at least, this is not their only national identity). Despite their citizenship, many Québécois, Aboriginal peoples, Acadians, English, Scots, Welsh, Irish and Northern Irish see those groups as their nations, even if they may also identify with the state or the nation associated with it.[6]

Use[edit]

As a legal status, citizenship is easier to determine than nationality in most circumstances and should be given priority when using the {{Infobox person}} template. Nationality should be listed only in addition to citizenship, and only in cases where it is verifiable and relevant to the article. For most articles, this just means using the citizenship field instead of the nationality field, as the citizenship of the article's subject is what editors are usually trying to convey with the latter term.

See also[edit]

Notes and references[edit]

  1. ^ a b Connor, Walker (1994). Ethnonationalism: The Quest for Understanding. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. 
  2. ^ The term "international" and organisational names like League of Nations and United Nations are themselves misnomers that perpetuate the ambiguity between state and nation. The correct (if unconventional) term in this case is "interstate"; the analogous name for the United Nations is, of course, already taken. Connor, Ethnonationalism, 40.
  3. ^ Cassese, Antonio (1995). Self-Determination of Peoples: A Legal Reappraisal. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. 
  4. ^ There are potentital exceptions, such as Jewish immigration to Israel, but such exceptions are uncommon.
  5. ^ See the article on German nationality law. Non-German minority groups living in Germany, such as Turkish Gastarbeiter, are exceptions to this example.
  6. ^ See the articles on each of these groups for more information.