Jump to content

Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Good log/March 2010

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

South Park (season 13)

[edit]

This is a good topic nomination. I've been working on this for some time in conjunction with the South Park Featured Topic Drive, and since all the articles are now GA status, I believe it's ready for GT. Nergaal and other WikiProject South Park users have helped out along the way. Thanks! — Hunter Kahn 04:19, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

German Type UB I submarines

[edit]
Main contribuitor: Bellhalla

He has suddenly stopped editing two months ago and I have left a notification on his talkpage about a month ago. This might be one of the last contributions that Bellhalla has given to Wikipedia. Nergaal (talk) 01:29, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I believe the subtopic should be separated because it has 5+1 article by itself and because I plan on nominating a super-topic on Austro-Hungarian classes or submarine list which would need the U-10 class as a subtopic by itself. Nergaal (talk) 01:29, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - I disagree as I do not think the topics are big enough to merit splitting. I definitely think that SM U-10 (Austria-Hungary) (the only one of the 5 not a GA but at GAN) and SM U-11 (Austria-Hungary), in particular, should be part of this topic, as they were originally used by the German navy, and were only later sold to Austria-Hungary (while the other three boats in the U-10 class were built for and used from the start by Austria-Hungary). Also I don't think your plans to nominate a supertopic are relevant as the U-10 class article can appear in such a supertopic whether it has its own topic or not. While it would make for nice visual structures, I don't see why this supertopic would need the U-10 class to appear as a subtopic at all. More than that, the subtopic link could actually point back to this topic - rst20xx (talk) 13:31, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, so you are suggesting to remove the class article and add 10 & 11, then in the supertopic put the class article but link here for the subtopic? Or you want the class and the five other articles here? Nergaal (talk) 07:13, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I think the second option would be better, and after all, 10 is the only one of the 6 articles that isn't a GA already - rst20xx (talk) 13:11, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
What should happen to the image in that case, as some of the boats did not run under the German flag. Nergaal (talk) 20:13, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
As the Germans made all the boats, I don't see a problem with still using this flag, or maybe the German national flag - rst20xx (talk) 14:46, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I've gotten SM U-11 to GA status and the GA for SM U-10 was a quick pass. All articles are at GA status now.--Coldplay Expért Let's talk 21:44, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes to all, Nergal promoted SM U-10 and I promoted SM U-11. However credit goes to Bellhalla for the whole thing. But all articles are now at GA.--Coldplay Expért Let's talk 21:55, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Saratoga campaign

[edit]

This topic is based on the contents of {{Campaignbox American Revolutionary War: Saratoga campaign}}, which are unified by the article on the Saratoga campaign. Magic♪piano 15:38, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quietly Confident Quartet

[edit]
Main contribuitor: YellowMonkey

Last time one article was missing. Nergaal (talk) 19:07, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No votes (even opposing) in a whole week? Nergaal (talk) 00:07, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well I can't vote; I'll give the main race another run-through YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars photo poll) 01:46, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]