Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Anarcho-capitalism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Resubmit. I think the POV issues as such are dealt with. View the earlier submission here : Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Anarcho-capitalism/Archive 1 Saswann 19:52, 8 August 2005 (UTC)

  • Support It's as qualified as any other featured article I've seen. RJII 20:05, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Support It will be even better if some pictorial explanation are shown on the Criticisms of anarcho-capitalism section. Deryck C. 07:50, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
I placed a picture in the section, we'll see how other editors accept it Saswann 13:13, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Support Superb effort. Is it possible to use a map like the ones used in Political spectrum to illustrate its philosophy. pamri 10:58, August 9, 2005 (UTC)
Are you saying there should be an example using one of the other existing maps listed in Political spectrum, (other than, or in addition to the existing one?) Saswann 12:26, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Support Nice job on a controversial subject, detailed footnotes, good NPOV. It's a little dull, and could use some livening up, IMO. It might help if there were some images earlier in the article, and maybe some snappy quotes that aren't about economics.--Bcrowell 17:04, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
I agree with that. Maybe a picture of one of the anarcho-capitalism symbols can be put in. RJII 17:06, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
The lead, in particular, is agonizing. A potential reader already has to overcome some barriers to get motivated to read the article (obscure topic, sounds like an oxymoron, never tried in practice as a real social system), and the boring lead is going to decrease readers' interest even more. --Bcrowell 17:10, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
I switched the first two paragraphs around. That should make it a little more approachable, since the first was really tortuous. RJII 17:49, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Support. well written and NPOV, good history on something only tried in theory. →ubεr nεmo lóquï 17:24, August 9, 2005 (UTC)
  • Support. Well written and balanced, also on the criticism side. --Tmh 16:53, 13 August 2005 (UTC)