Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Giotto di Bondone/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was not promoted 01:38, 29 September 2007.
self nominationThis article which is a top importance art article and a core importance biography has ben rewritten and properly referenced by an art historian. It is stable apart from continual kiddy vandalism! Amandajm 07:26, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Oppose, nice article, but parts of it lack citations.Grahamec 11:43, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
- Support Grahamec 14:30, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Done Added more citations Amandajm 13:46, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
- Can you inline the citations in the part where it says "section references:"? That's really strange style for Wikipedia; the references should go on the sentences or paragraphs that they serve. — brighterorange (talk) 15:57, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Comment:You seem to have nominated a lot of pages recently claiming they are written by architectural or art historians. I find this concerning as I see no well known architectural historians in the history. Bearing in mind that Wikipedia has to be beyond reproach in its claims - I would like to know who these people are and their proven qualifications (or list of publications) to be so termed. If these facts are not available I don't think the claim of qualified authorship should be made. I have commented in full on only one of your nominations as I feel you should concentrate on one page at a time. Multiple nominations are discouraged. Giano 13:40, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.