Wikipedia:Featured article review/Diego Velázquez/archive2
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was removed 19:42, 19 January 2007.
Review commentary
[edit]- Messages left at DanielNuyu, Bio and Spain. Sandy (Talk) 01:03, 14 December 2006 (UTC) Also Visual arts. Chick Bowen 02:37, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
My major problem is the lack of citations. Zero! Not even one!! Only some references with printed sources and sites, but no indication about the way they were used. Some further minor problems:
- The lead is a bit problematic. For example:"His two visits to Italy while part of the Spanish court are well documented." Is this a proper phrase for the lead? The phrase could say that "Velázquez visited twice the Italy in the X and the Y year", but the documentation of the visit is an issue of analysis for the main article and not the lead.
- "Selected works" is tagged, and this is an important issue for a FA. Personally, I believe that the section in question is incomplete.--Yannismarou 19:21, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The headings don't conform to WP:MOS, but probably an easy fix. Jay32183 22:58, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC - uncited. Sandy (Talk) 01:29, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
FARC commentary
[edit]- Suggested FA criteria concerns are citations (1c), LEAD (2a), and comprehensiveness (1b). Marskell 07:37, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove, unless my concerns are addressed.--Yannismarou 18:55, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove—Seriously under-referenced and poorly written. 1a, 2a and 1c. Tony 08:46, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove per above. LuciferMorgan 10:11, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.