Wikipedia:Featured article review/Hebrew calendar/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was removed 17:52, 12 June 2007.
Hebrew calendar[edit]
Review commentary[edit]
- Message left at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Jewish history, though I don't have a clue who nominated the article, as it was apparently over three years ago.
This article, which was made an FA many, many, many moons ago, contains a list of references, but no inline citations of any kind except for four footnotes over the span of two sentences. I would argue that this is in no way "brilliant prose"- in fact, the article is (to me) downright confusing (this coming from a guy who was raised Conservative Jew). The article also contains a big ol' linkfarm- how many date converters do we need? -- Kicking222 15:55, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- It's a "brilliant prose" relic. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:02, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
FARC commentary[edit]
- Suggested FA criteria concerns are citations (1c), prose (1a), excess links (2). Marskell 15:17, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove per 1c, 1a and 2. LuciferMorgan 22:16, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment As there has been barely any discussion on this page about the article in question, let me state that very little has been done on the article since I nom'd it for FA delisting almost a month ago. The same problems still remain, and they have barely (if at all) been alleviated. Thus, I would still urge removal. -- Kicking222 23:58, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.