Wikipedia:Featured article review/Mor lam/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:Featured article review/Mor lam)
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was removed by YellowAssessmentMonkey 00:49, 2 June 2009 [1].
Review commentary
[edit]- Notified: User_talk:Henry_Flower, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Thailand, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Southeast Asia, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Rock music/Regional and national rock music taskforce.
FA from 2004, referencing/1c issues, could use a review of the images to see if the two free-use have appropriate documentation and if the fair-use image is appropriately used or is something that could be replaced by a free-use image, or simply described in the article's text. Cirt (talk) 07:52, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The article should follow a well defined transcription method for the many Thai words it contains. Preferred standard for Thai in wikipedia is Royal Thai General System of Transcription or RTGS. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Woodstone (talk • contribs) 09:17, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Advocacy of your preferred transcription system is of course entirely legitimate, but it´s misleading to suggest that it is the standard on Wikipedia. For much discussion, see Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Thailand#Romanization and the related drafts. In any case, there´s a lot more Lao and Isan here than Thai.
- As far as referencing goes, you can decide for yourselves whether it meets currrent FA requirements. ;) HenryFlower 13:41, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The two free images are fine. I'm not concerned by the fair-use one: it is a single frame comprising only one-twentyfifth of a second of running time, and it does illustrate the genre. DrKiernan (talk) 14:22, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
FARC commentary
[edit]- Suggested FA criteria concern are citations, and diversity thereof (Miller is the author of Garland). Also note the recent change to WP:WIAFA (1c) requiring "high-quality" sources. YellowMonkey (cricket calendar poll!) 05:10, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, per FA criteria concerns. Cirt (talk) 07:51, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.