Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/2010 IIHF World Championship rosters/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Dabomb87 23:31, 25 February 2011 [1].

2010 IIHF World Championship rosters

Featured list candidates/2010 IIHF World Championship rosters/archive1

Nominator(s): Salavat (talk) 12:29, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, same as the 2009 list, and basically the same as the 2007 and 2008, here is the 2010 list. Salavat (talk) 12:29, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 17:20, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

*Link "International Ice Hockey Federation" in the lead.

Linked. Salavat (talk) 03:39, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lead caption - (1) "Arrival of the winning..." (rather than champion) would be better (2) Avoid starting sentences with numbers, e.g. "2010 was..."

Changed to winner. Removed second sentence. Salavat (talk) 03:39, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"A country that had selected fewer than the maximum allowed must have chosen the .." instead of "must have chosen" maybe "were required to choose..."?

Fixed. Salavat (talk) 03:39, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"to select an additional two players to their roster" this may be an ENGVAR thing but in BritEng we don't "select ... to" we "add ... to" so it'd be "to add an additional two players to their roster"

Fixed. Salavat (talk) 03:39, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"a maximum of 25 players" no need to repeat players.

Fixed. Salavat (talk) 03:39, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Dimitrij Kotschnew " no j in our article.

Fixed. Salavat (talk) 03:39, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Three Italians with "De" in their surname, actually should be "de" in the surname.

Fixed. Salavat (talk) 03:39, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

", the sixth time they had done so" why not just "for the sixth time."?

Fixed. Salavat (talk) 16:50, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"the player would have had to play two " -> "the player was required to have played two..."

Fixed. Salavat (talk) 03:39, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Two out of four paras in the lead talk about the inclusion critieria and only one talks about the players themselves. Do you consider this a reasonable split?

This format has been used on all three previous lists. Both paragraphs dont talk about inclusion criteria, won is basically how a country goes about forming the team for the tournament whereas the other is about the eligibility of a player who wants to play for a certain country. The last paragraph could be expanded if you think it is necessary for example I could mention the players who were included in the Media All-Star team and I could also put a sentence in about Dennis Endras being the first German to be awarded MVP. Salavat (talk) 17:07, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why do we have bold links in the tables? Why aren't the table's contents unbold?

I believe i fixed this or did you want the other parts unbolded? Salavat (talk) 16:56, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Johan Auvitu seems to be Yohann according to us?

Fixed. Salavat (talk) 16:49, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pierre-Edouard Bellemare is missing his acute accent on the E of Edouard.

Fixed. Salavat (talk) 16:49, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Same for the first e in the surname of Loïc Lamperier.

Fixed. Salavat (talk) 16:49, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Did Ferhi and Lherny really have identical save %?

Well techinically no, Ferhi had 0.9014 while Lherny had 0.9013, but due to rounding being used they both end up at 0.901. Salavat (talk) 16:49, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nicola Fantanive->Fontanive.

Fixed. Salavat (talk) 16:49, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Rambling Man (talk) 18:39, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 17:18, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

*Min is really Min:sec isn't it?

Yes it is. Would it be preferable to round them to the nearest minute (this is done in the 2007 and 2008 list) or change the heading to Min:sec? Salavat (talk) 16:37, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Round 'em per the other lists, consistency is good. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:20, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rounded. Salavat (talk) 18:11, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And so on. There's a weird tense thing going on in the lead. The criteria are historical so should be referred to in the past.

My sense of different tenses is pretty shocking so I read through it and changed a sentence but I couldnt see anything else. Sentence I changed was third paragraph, first sentence. Salavat (talk) 17:07, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll read through it in a few days time to check. If I forget, please nudge me! The Rambling Man (talk) 17:20, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments - I don't understand why there are 3 different tables for the key. Ref 4-6 as well as all the Stats and Rosters need a format parameter. Afro (Talk) 00:43, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The three different tables block out different items, one for statistics, one for positions, and one for the two general items that need explaining. Format has been added to all references mentioned. Salavat (talk) 04:20, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What's the problem with keeping it to one table? Afro (Talk) 21:53, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Hows it look now? Salavat (talk) 02:19, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why isn't the Legend included in the TOC? You mention in the lead the Czech Republic won the tournament but mention nothing of a runner-up, why?. Afro (Talk) 15:21, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Added and mentioned. Salavat (talk) 15:43, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support - I have no issues with the list. Afro (Talk) 11:53, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - None of the images have alt text. --Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 17:45, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

According to my last FLC it had been removed as a featured list criteria back in April 2010. Has there been a change since? Salavat (talk) 07:00, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not that I know of. I'm so far behind that I didn't realize it had been removed.--Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 16:10, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As I understand it, alt text is part of the MOS, so a list that didn't have alt text for its images would be in violation of criterion #5. Powers ^T 23:53, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well whether its required or not ive gone and added it in. Salavat (talk) 07:28, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 16:10, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

~~Comment~~ Support – ~~Only thing I see is that "the" should be added before "tournament's most valuable player and top goaltender...".~~ Giants2008 (27 and counting) 22:23, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Salavat (talk) 03:32, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support Can't find anything to gripe about. Courcelles 13:26, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.