Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Jennifer Lawrence filmography/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was not promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:31, 3 June 2016 (UTC) [1].[reply]
Jennifer Lawrence filmography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Nominator(s): Krish | Talk 12:14, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because Jennifer Lawrence, as we all know, is one of the few actresses who have garnered both critical acclaim and commercial success, and that too in such a short span of time. I wanted to work on her article since 2012 but couldn't. However, I started working on her filmography, which I feel meets the FL criteria. Looking forward to lots of feedback on this.Krish | Talk 12:14, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose not enough content for a separate article. The table content can all easily fit in her main bio without worries. No prejudice against renominating in the future, but this is simply premature. Wait until she's done more work. Snuggums (talk / edits) 13:38, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose I was surprised to see this nominated here. She has starred in all of 24 films, 8 television shows. The tables only took up 3k of a 66k article. Needless contentfork. Recommend that it be reinstated in the main article. Cowlibob (talk) 15:03, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments – Although I'm not heavily involved with media lists, I was always under the impression that 25 films was considered a bare minimum for a stand-alone filmography. Perhaps I was wrong on that number, or maybe the standards have changed over time. Personally, I think that, under her current pace of starring in movies, there will be enough for a FL in 2–3 years. Unfortunately, that doesn't help much right now. Since I don't want you to feel like the time you spent working on the article failed to produce any payoff, I have a few suggestions for you. First, the tables are clearly an improvement over the uncited ones in the main article. If you do move these into the main article, it will make efforts to upgrade that page much easier. Second, the Dior and I documentary isn't listed in the main article at all, so placing the film table in the main article will make that page more comprehensive. Third, the reference for The Devil You Know isn't that strong. Try seeing if this has the information needed; I also found articles referring to the film on The Washington Post and Huffington Post in a search. Giants2008 (Talk) 18:24, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Filmography tables in main bios only need citing when they contain information not previously mentioned and referenced within article body, just saying, though I do think it would help in general to clearly state her character names from films as opposed to only character descriptions. Snuggums (talk / edits) 20:15, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@FLC director and delegates: This list has been reconverted to a redirect per this articles for deletion discussion. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer Lawrence filmography. Cowlibob (talk) 17:42, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, archiving then. --PresN 17:47, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been not promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.