Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Boston Bruins head coaches
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by User:The Rambling Man 06:47, 28 July 2008 [1].
previous FLC (06:38, 14 July 2008)
I am nominating this article with Milk's Favorite Cookie to be promoted to a featured list candidate because I think it is very deserving to become a featured list. Annoyomous24 23:38, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OpposeIssues raised in the previous FLC have not been addressed.--Crzycheetah 22:04, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]- Done with everything. Except: I didn't fix the redirects per this. I also didn't limit the colors to the player names. Looking at the 30+ head coaches lists, it would just be odd for this one to stick out. « Milk's Favorite Cøøkie 22:09, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirects should be fixed per the link you provided. Read the second bullet in the "exceptions".--Crzycheetah 22:19, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. I only found two. « Milk's Favorite Cøøkie 22:34, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- OK! As for the coloring, of course, I meant all head coach lists, not just this one. There's just too much color in these head coach lists.--Crzycheetah 00:04, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. I only found two. « Milk's Favorite Cøøkie 22:34, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
- "in their team history" should be "in its team history" as the history is for the franchise
- DONE!
- for "an Original Six team," perhaps explain in a single phrase what that means? Perhaps something like "the original teams of the NHL"
Gary King (talk) 03:57, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I can't do your second bullet because it is originally called the Original Six. Annoyomous24 23:54, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
CommentSupport It would be a good idea to include Stanley Cups won in the awards section. After all, winning the Cup is the best a coach can do, even better than winning the Adams Award. DONE! Kaiser matias (talk) 06:51, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- That looks good, but it would probably be better to rephrase winning the Cup to reflect the name, perhaps something like "Won Stanley Cup (year)" seeing how referring to the Stanley Cup usually involves the actual name of the title, not simply stating a champtionship won. Kaiser matias (talk) 18:57, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- DONE! –– K. Annoyomous24 21:27, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.