Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Czech submissions for Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by User:The Rambling Man 07:23, 9 July 2008 [1].
And here's another one. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 09:04, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment This looks good, but unlink the years (MOS:UNLINKYEARS). Gary King (talk) 17:01, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support This is a really good list. Just add a period at the end of the image caption.--Dem393 (talk) 05:45, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- There's no need since it's still a fragment and doesn't require a full stop. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 22:20, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Professional work. - Darwinek (talk) 15:32, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
CommentsSupport Two things I don't like,The lead should not start with the word "since", but with the subject instead.The first paragraph is just a one long sentence.
--Crzycheetah 08:52, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Fixed, although I think the former wording was fine. A reader isn't going to think that "Since 1994" is the subject by any means, and it doesn't have to be the absolute first thing the reader sees. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 07:19, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for the changes. I know that my comments appeared as if the subject must be the first thing, but I didn't mean it that way. I just didn't like it when a whole new article began with the conjunction. Starting with the subject is the safest way to go, I think. --Crzycheetah 08:35, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Fair enough. Thanks for clarifying your intent. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 02:55, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Good list, shouldn't be any problem having this featured. The DominatorTalkEdits 20:44, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Well written, meets criteria. I have no other comments and can't even find a typo! Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 08:08, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments
- Being a bit picky, you may need to explain the (67th) etc in the table as the heading just says Year.
- Just two red links left, it'd be perfect if you could create, as a minimum, stubs for those guys?
- Nothing serious though. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:22, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Added a clarification for the Academy Award ceremonies. As for the directors, I can understand creating stubs for the submissions, as they're the central part of the list, but creating stubs for the directors is a little bit of a stretch :p Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 20:31, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.