Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Selena Gomez discography/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:31, 31 July 2016 (UTC) [1].[reply]
Selena Gomez discography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): SennKev (talk) 12:04, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This article details the discography of American singer Selena Gomez. I am nominating this for featured list because I think it meets the criteria and I believe the article is well-referenced and well-written.
- I would support this article if the lead was in fact "well-referenced", which it's not. It has a mere three references for four entire bodies, and has quite errors.
- You need an extra space in between "Come & Get It" and "which reached the top 10..." in the lead's third paragraph
Done
- Certifications (Gold, Silver, etc.) should not be capitalized when mentioned in the lead, so "certified Gold by the RIAA." --> "certified gold by the RIAA." in each instance this appears.
Done
- I am confused as to why the first two paragraphs of the lead discuss her work with The Scene, yet there is no mention of it in the article. And since it shouldn't be mentioned in the article, I don't see the need for the first two paragraphs.
Done
- You need an extra space in between "Come & Get It" and "which reached the top 10..." in the lead's third paragraph
- If you cite sources for each statement in the lead without one, I might change my mind, but for now, I do not support this FLC. Carbrera (talk) 06:10, 6 July 2016 (UTC).[reply]
- @Carbrera: Is it okay now ? Thanks for your review. --SennKev (talk) 9:35, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support, everything checks out with me now. Carbrera (talk) 16:18, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments by AJona1992
- Either specify what is a 3x platinum award or link RIAA certification.
Done
- Remove "in the same country." and replace it with "in the United States."
Done change --> by the RIAA
- "It became her second consecutive album to peak at number one on Billboard 200" change to "It went on to become her second consecutive number one album on the Billboard 200"
Done
- You should include information about her EP in the lead for better flow. – jona ✉ 16:05, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done
- Remove "new" from the sentence that begins with her signing a contract with Interscope Records.
Done
- "with the label" - who?
Done Hollywood Records
- The footnote does not say that Gomez sold "more than" 6.2 million copies but that she sold nearly 6.2 million copies which does not mean she sold over that amount. It also says she old more than 22 million copies not that her exact number is 22 million. – jona ✉ 18:48, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done
- @AJona1992: Thanks for your comments! Is it okay now ? --SennKev (talk) 23:08, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- @AJona1992: Is it okay now ? --SennKev (talk) 19:12, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- I now support the article. If you're not too busy, it would be appreciated if you left a review on my FLC Thanks – jona ✉ 23:17, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments by Mymis
- Link "Billboard 200" in introduction, also add U.S. before to indicate it's an American chart
- "Her second studio album, Revival was released" -> comma is needed after Revival
- The sentence starting with "With its singles "Good for You" (fea..." is bit long and complicated, could be easily split into two sentences.
- Is it really necessary to mention how many albums were pure?
- "Various Artists for Orlando" sounds like a band's name, maybe just "Various artists"?
- Hypenhs (-) should be replaced with en dashes (–) when they are not part of words per MOS:DASH.
- References need quite a lot of formatting, the publishers must be linked in the first reference they appear, Allmusic -> Allmusic, Billboard -> Billboard; accessdates are missing etc.
Mymis (talk) 14:51, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- @Mymis: Thanks for your comments! Is it okay now ? I have changed many things... Could you please check ? --SennKev (talk) 20:12, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Further comments:
- "atop the Billboard 200." -> "atop the U.S. Billboard 200 chart."
Done
- Ref 74 is not properly formatted, date, author is needed, title not supposed to be all in caps; all caps also probably not needed in ref 49, 64, 53
Done
- "E! Online UK" -> "E!" or "E! News"
Done
- not all dashes are replaced with longer ones
Would be happy to support it once all the issues are fixed. Mymis (talk) 08:34, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- @Mymis: Sorry but I don't really undstertand "not all dashes are replaced with longer ones" --SennKev (talk) 11:31, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I meant like "Selena Gomez - Chart History - Canada." -> "Selena Gomez – Chart History – Canada." Mymis (talk) 11:37, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- @Mymis: Is it okay now ? --SennKev (talk) 12:04, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I believe the article meets the FL criteria, and happy to support it. Mymis (talk) 12:04, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- @Mymis: Thanks for your support! --SennKev (talk) 12:08, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from SNUGGUMS
|
---|
At least for now, I oppose this nomination. Snuggums (talk / edits) 15:10, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
|
I see no more glaring issues and can now support this for FL. Snuggums (talk / edits) 00:18, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- @SNUGGUMS: Thanks for your support! --SennKev (talk) 12:08, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Source review
- Formatting: Any title that uses ALLCAPS for wording should be corrected to title case (e.g. ref 7 SELENA GOMEZ -> Selena Gomez). Ref 1: E! should be linked.
- Spotchecks: checked refs 7, 21, 38, 71 - all clean
- Completeness: nothing obviously missing.
Two small issues to fix before passing. --PresN 17:24, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, promoting. --PresN 00:24, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.