Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/Michael Jackson videography/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was removed by Pres N 15:02, 17 September 2015 (UTC) [1].[reply]

Michael Jackson videography

Featured list removal candidates/Michael Jackson videography/archive1

Nominating this list per it's lack of sourcing throughout. Specifically:

Music videos

In the Director(s) column, several listings contain "N/A", which is not only untemplated, but also unexplained.
In the Director(s) column, several listings contain no director at all for unexplained reasons.
A total of 19 entries are unreferenced.

Filmography

A total of 3 entries are unreferenced.

Video albums

The listing Making of Michael Jackson's Thriller is unreferenced.
The listing HIStory World Tour: Live in Seoul is unreferenced.
The listing Michael Jackson's This Is It is unreferenced.
The listing Bad 25 is unreferenced.

References

Fifteen dead references: #2, #55, #64, #66, #80, #74, #71, #73, #83, #76, #79, #82, #75, #84, #72.
Several references (#11, #12, #16) are other Wikipedia articles.
Ref #50 is a bare url.

Been nearly six years since this list was promoted, and its quality has unfortunately not been upheld. Azealia911 _talk 19:04, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delist – I am very sad to say it, but this list currently does not meet the criteria as expected. Also, Azealia, you're supposed to notify the main editor, but Pyrrhus16, I believe, is inactive. -- Frankie _talk 22:06, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I did take notifications into account, and probably should have noted, but both the article creator and it's main editors have been inactive for a great length of time. Wikipedia:WikiProject Michael Jackson is also inactive. Azealia911 _talk 22:10, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delist too many problems with referencing Snuggums (talk / edits) 19:43, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delist Unfortunately a key list like this is in bad condition. Many referencing issues. Large proportion of references are to Halstead's book which is self-published so can be unreliable. Lack of rowscopes and rowcols for access on the tables. Cowlibob (talk) 19:08, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Closing this FLRC as delist: no fixes made, multiple delist votes. --Pres N 15:01, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.