Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/A Busy Ha Long Bay

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A Busy Ha Long Bay[edit]

Original -Vietnam's Ha Long Bay busy with boats passing through.
Reason
This photo is beautifully dynamic with the bay water as a stage, the rocks as a far wall, the foliage as a close frame, the sky and passage as "the beyond", and the boats are the life of the photo.
Articles this image appears in
Southeast Asia,

Vietnam, Halong Bay, List of World Heritage Sites in Asia and Australasia, Cinema of Vietnam, Template:Vietnamesefilmlist, List of Vietnamese films, User:Derlinus/Unesco User:Qweqweqweqweqweqweqweqweqweqwe

Creator
Ekstazo
  • Support as nominator Rj1020 (talk) 05:08, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, looks like a photo that could be taken by every tourist. The location is notable but the photograph is not unique or special. Witty Lama 14:39, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. The shot or caption doesn't really give information as to why the boats are there; is there a landing or dock there? Sky nearly totally overexposed. -- atropos235 (blah blah, my past) 14:54, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per above -Wutschwlllm (talk) 21:40, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. I've struck the userpages as 'articles' - they don't count. The two above them are also dubious. --jjron (talk) 16:12, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Funny, I just saw a similar photo in Yesterday's paper. I've seen other pictures of the bay, and this doesn't rank too highly among them. SpencerT♦C 00:22, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Snapshot Mfield (talk) 12:59, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose However, it's not just a tourist snapshop - it is an excellent composition and well framed. It has depth and activity and is an image that hold the attention - but - I agree totally with atropos235 It looks washed out in the distance - it must be possible to catch the scene with much more colour, and the activity needs explanation.

Motmit (talk) 08:33, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose I think that it is a good photo, but not an excellent one. Two reasons: overexposed sky and level (clockwise rotation needed) -- Dmottl (talk) 22:19, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted . --John254 01:34, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]