Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Gull

A nice image by a respected Wikipedian photographer. Encyclopedic, meets all requirements... etc...

Nominate and Support - Viva La V i e Boheme
~~Conditional Support~~ Oppose Per Diliff.Nnfolz 00:14, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. It just doesn't really add much value to the articles as they are flooded with pretty good images of gulls, and I agree that there is some confusion about its species. It looks like a Silver Gull to me, and according to the description of a Yellow-legged Gull, it doesn't seem to exist (or at least feature in the article) in Australia so at the very least, the filename is not accurate as it alludes to a species that it doesn't represent. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 11:22, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Diliff --Dschwen 05:12, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Kind of boring, and an awkward angle (can't really see the bird's neck). howch e ng {chat} 20:16, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted