Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Jon Heder
Appearance
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 22 Mar 2012 at 19:18:59 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7c/Jon_Heder_by_Gage_Skidmore.jpg/260px-Jon_Heder_by_Gage_Skidmore.jpg)
- Reason
- Nice candid pic of a celebrity
- Articles in which this image appears
- Jon Heder, Napoleon Dynamite (TV series) +1
- FP category for this image
- People/Entertainment
- Creator
- GageSkidmore
- Support as nominator --—Eustress talk 19:18, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- Is it possible for the background, specifically the ComicCon logo, to be blurred and whitened a bit more? Matthewedwards : Chat 06:06, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose Blurry, noisy, poor lighting, eyes in shadow. JJ Harrison (talk) 08:35, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose. Primarily the blur - Although not noticable in the thumbnail, it's very blurry. Ðiliff «» (Talk) 10:46, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose per JJ Harrison/Diliff. Using f2.8 at 300mm on a crop sensor seems to be asking for a miracle if one wants a portrait with the eyes in sharp focus. However, maybe that's a valid choice if one is aiming for a photo that's good at typical webpage size with a nice blurry background. Plus there doesn't seem to be any room to adjust the ISO or speed without making things worse. Some chroma noise reduction and more luck with the focus would made the difference. Colin°Talk 18:53, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- Indeed, it's a miracle that the photo isn't much blurrier. 1/40s exposure at f/2.8 and ISO 800 with an effective focal length of about 500mm. Must have been very dark. Ðiliff «» (Talk) 11:29, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose. Noise and blur. Clegs (talk) 08:47, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
Not Promoted --Makeemlighter (talk) 10:18, 22 March 2012 (UTC)