Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Photographer in Calgary

Reason: It is well composed (in my opinion), illustrates the topic well, and is of adequate size and resolution.
Articles this image appears in: Photographer
Creator: Stromcarlson

Support as nominator Kakofonous (talk) 19:43, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Excellent resolution, great focus, and highly illustrative of the topic. Dr. Extreme (talk) 20:26, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Well composed, but the gray tarp is really distracting. The FP for photographer ought to be really outstanding. -Matthew Cieplak ^{(talk) (edits)} 00:59, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Over saturated background. Grey tarp detracts (whats the point of photographing an object you can only see 2/3rds of and is covered by another object that is nondescript?). --Mike Spenard (talk) 03:06, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It isn't a bad picture, but there's just nothing special about it; zero 'wow-factor.' faithless (^speak) 08:17, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Mike Spenard. Cacophony (talk) 08:19, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Mike Spenard Mfield (talk) 12:02, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not to sound like a broken record, but I'm jumping on the Mike bandwagon. --ErgoSum88 (talk) 20:56, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per faithless. —αἰτίας •discussion• 22:45, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per faithless. It's a guy taking a picture. Purple Is Pretty (talk) 00:05, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Opposethe backround is not good. the lens is the only good thing to see in this photo --Ulughmuztagh (talk) 17:43, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted . --John254 02:55, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]