Wikipedia:Featured picture candidatesImage/Clay Anderson spacewalk

Edit 1

Reason: This image has unbelievable clarity, and is very sharp. This is a very crisp, clean and beautiful image.
Articles this image appears in: Clay Anderson
Creator: NASA (uploaded by - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 21:35, 20 January 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Support as nominator - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 21:35, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is an exceptional photo! Very clear, with a cool background. Neutral Based on the objections raised by several others. Clegs (talk) 22:06, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not perfect, but very nice nonetheless.--Here T oHelp 22:36, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, white caption bar is not acceptable, NASA image flood on FPC is just boring. I don't find the images exceptional, except that they are taken at a place where the usual contriibutor cannot easily go. But then we might just tag every NASA image FP. --Dschwen 23:27, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Dschwen. The large bar on the left side is also distracting. I think it has very limited encyclopedic value to Clay Anderson. Looking at the photo I can't even tell if the subject is a male or female, much less who it is. Cacophony (talk) 00:11, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support - very nice. jj137 ^♠ 00:23, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Regretful Oppose Both Original and Edit 1 Original has the distracting bar, while Edit 1 has some focus issues. While they are both amazing shots, they are not the best of what Wikipedia has to offer. --Shark face 217 01:51, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted MER-C 02:26, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NOTE: I recently discovered that this image isn't even Clayton. It's Rick Mastracchio according to NASA. --TheDJ (talk • contribs) 20:28, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]