Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2007 December 4

< December 3	December 5 >

December 4

Image:Suleymaniye-sl1.jpg

Image:Suleymaniye-sl1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ajda (notify | contribs).

Uploader first tagged PD-self then asked for deletion without clear reason. Jusjih 02:33, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Vapur_kadikoy1.jpg

Image:Vapur_kadikoy1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ajda (notify | contribs).

Uploader first tagged PD-self then asked for deletion without clear reason. Jusjih 02:34, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:JGC.pdf

Image:JGC.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Amkakay (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 03:24, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Tabligh.pdf

Image:Tabligh.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Amkakay (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 03:25, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Tackey-&-tsubasa.jpg

Image:Tackey-&-tsubasa.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tuppa (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader, User's only upload Nv8200p talk 03:25, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Taffy01.JPG

Image:Taffy01.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jennieosmith (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Low quality, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 03:32, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Tamil_SW_time_table_A07.pdf

Image:Tamil_SW_time_table_A07.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ardicdxclub (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 03:34, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Tamilee_Webb.pdf

Image:Tamilee_Webb.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ironprince (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 03:35, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Tavernost2.JPG

Image:Tavernost2.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tavernost (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 03:42, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Tavernost.jpg

Image:Tavernost.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tavernost (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 03:43, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Tb_green.jpg

Image:Tb_green.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tba03 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 03:45, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Tea_8.JPG

Image:Tea_8.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Q4680 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 03:52, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Tea_6.JPG

Image:Tea_6.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Q4680 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 03:53, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Team_bacon.jpg

Image:Team_bacon.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Amber_dominos (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 03:59, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was:

Image:WAMM-AM.JPG

Image:WAMM-AM.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Neutralhomer (notify | contribs).

Image is of an extremely high resolution, a violation of the fair-use guidelines. JPG-GR 05:20, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, now that it's been reduced. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 14:13, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - image has been reduced and is now within F-U guidelines. - NeutralHomer ^T:C 22:41, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:WCYK-FM 2007.jpg

Image:WCYK-FM 2007.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Neutralhomer (notify | contribs).

Image is of an extremely high resolution, a violation of the fair-use guidelines. JPG-GR 05:58, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, now that it's been reduced. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 14:13, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - image has been reduced and is now within F-U guidelines. - NeutralHomer ^T:C 22:41, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:WKAV-AM 2007.jpg

Image:WKAV-AM 2007.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Neutralhomer (notify | contribs).

Image is of an extremely high resolution, a violation of the fair-use guidelines. JPG-GR 06:02, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, now that it's been reduced. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 14:13, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - image has been reduced and is now within F-U guidelines. - NeutralHomer ^T:C 22:41, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Alandearf.jpg

Image:Alandearf.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by RockMozart13 (notify | contribs).

I though the Image was free but its not — Preceding unsigned comment added by RockMozart13 (talk • contribs) 01:07, December 4, 2007
I have tagged the image for speedy deletion under WP:CSD#G7, author request. —Caesura ^(t) 23:08, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was:

Image:Salvatore_Lo_Piccolo.jpg

Image:Salvatore_Lo_Piccolo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mafia_Expert (notify | contribs).

This is an AP photo, cropped from this photo. We can't use AP photos anyway. Besides that, we have a free photo of this person, and the person is living. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 14:11, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It is not clear whether this an AP photo (might as well be Ansa, see [1], or Reuters, see: [2]), it is taken from Italian State Police site, which in my view makes it PD. Probably it is a police photo distributed by several photo agencies. (See for instance the mugshot Image:Salvatore_LoPiccolo.jpg from the Italian police most wanted list, which appears as a Ansa photo in [3]) Versions of this photo or similar ones are all over Internet. I don't see the urgency to delete it. I think it is important to keep it to illustrate (1) the arrest of Lo Piccolo and (2) to show the difference with the photofit which is in the article as well. I think that is sufficient reason for fair use. What free photo are you talking about, anyway? If the mysterious free photo does illustrate the above as well I have no problem to replace it. Maybe you can make it available somewhere. (See also my comments here) - Mafia Expert 18:20, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- We generally can't use photos of living people; this is due to our Foundation licensing resolution. We also can't use AP (or other press agency) photos except in very rare cases of critical commentary on iconic images. There is no evidence that this image was taken by the Italian police, and it would not be a free image even if it were. The free image I referred to is this one, which was tagged as public domain at the time of my comment, until you changed it to be use the {{mugshot}} tag. Unfortunately, if that image is not free, then we probably can't use it either, since the person is still living. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 20:17, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Maybe you could consider reading WP:NFC: photos from a press agencies are not permitted unless the photo itself is the subject of sourced commentary in the article. The photos are discussed in the text and with some good faith and leniency might apply for above mentioned exception. - Mafia Expert (talk) 21:57, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Or consider this: Fair use is a doctrine in United States copyright law that allows limited use of copyrighted material without requiring permission from the rights holders, such as use for scholarship or review. I think this also applies. Unless you think Wikipedia has no scholarly purpose. I think there is sufficient leeway, in particular because the three images are discussed in the text in relation to each other. - Mafia Expert (talk) 22:16, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, violates WP:NFCC#1 and WP:NFCC#2. —Angr ^{If you've written a quality article...} 05:07, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: It does not as explained above. Moreover, as is clear from you user page and your contributions you are simply on a campaign to remove every fair use image on Wikipedia. WP:NFC is not set in stone and should be treated with common sense and the occasional exception. - Mafia Expert (talk) 17:56, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - While it's true Wikipedia's quality would be vastly improved if all non-free images were removed, I don't actually argue to delete those that are in compliance with current policy. This one isn't. It's an image of living person being used only to show what he looks like; there's no critical commentary relating specifically to this very photograph; and it's a non-iconic image from a news agency. —Angr ^{If you've written a quality article...} 19:59, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    - There is a critical commentary and a reference to the images in the article. Read something before you put down your preconceived opinions. - Mafia Expert (talk) 20:19, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted as a violation of WP:NFCC#1 and #2. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 04:07, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was:

Image:USS Sutherland.jpg

Image:USS Sutherland.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by E Pluribus Anthony (notify | contribs).

Redundant non-free use image, already represented with Image:Farragut0a.jpg - second image not necessary. Ejfetters 19:09, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and delete Farragut0a.jpg; this one does a better job of showing what the ship looks like, while in the Farragut pic the saucer hides everything. TomTheHand 19:16, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well, one ought to be deleted, although I'll let the Star Trek enthusiasts decide which one. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 20:22, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and delete Farragut0a.jpg per TomTheHand. —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 21:25, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have no problem with deleting the other and keeping this one, seems fine. Ejfetters (talk) 23:37, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Per consensus, Image:USS Sutherland.jpg was kept, and Image:Farragut0a.jpg was deleted. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 18:04, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Aaltman.jpg

Image:Aaltman.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mcradical (notify | contribs).

Orphaned and unencyclopedic. —An gr ^{If you've written a quality article...} 20:08, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Karl Stefanovic.jpg

Image:Karl Stefanovic.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tjkirk (notify | contribs).

Listed as pd author but the image is clearly from the commercial and copyright website [4] (image link) Peripitus (Talk) 20:45, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CynthiaBreazeal.jpg

Image:CynthiaBreazeal.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Scarecroe (notify | contribs).

Unfree image of a living person, which was uploaded and used in violation of WP:NFCC#1. The given fair use template states that this image is used "for identification and critical commentary on the station ID or program and its contents", but it is very clear that the image is only intended for use in the article about the person, to show how she looks like (the image is not used in the article about the TV program and will probably never be, as it doesn't show any discerning features of this program). The added claim "no free equivalent is available or could be created" is totally without evidence, as this person is alive and active. High on a tree (talk) 22:35, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:NCC1701Bdrydock.jpg

Image:NCC1701Bdrydock.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Fuzzy510 (notify | contribs).

Free use image:USS Enterprise NCC 1701B.jpg should replace this non-free image. Though I don't care for this other image, and like the other image better, I am afraid that if a free-use alternative is available, we have to use it instead of the non-free use image. If someone knows of some policy that says we can keep this one, by all means, add it in here. Ejfetters (talk) 23:49, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:USSMalinche.jpg

Image:USSMalinche.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Pr1983 (notify | contribs).

Redundant non-free use - we already have 2 images of the Excelsior class in the article, no need for a 3rd. NCC1701Bdrydock.jpg can suffice, if that is ultimately deleted, USS Enterprise 1701B.jpg will suffice on its own. Every angle of the ship is not needed. Ejfetters (talk) 23:52, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Solow fed.jpg

Image:Solow fed.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by AdamSmithee (notify | contribs).

No evidence for the claim that this "is a work of the United States Federal Government". On the contrary, the web site which is given as source states: "Digitized photos, graphics and logos on the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis' web site are the property of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis and may not be used without written permission". (According to the article Federal Reserve System, these banks are private institutions which are not part of the U.S. government.) High on a tree (talk) 23:59, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- OK, my mistake, I thought the Fed is covered by the US gov thing. Delete AdamSmithee (talk) 07:50, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]