Wikipedia:Peer review/12-3 incident/archive1

12-3 incident[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because this article is about an important political event. I want to bring it up to the quality of the Chinese version of the article. Any input would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks, Jp16103 16:10, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from AustralianRupert: G'day, thanks for your efforts on this article so far. Unfortunately I don't have any knowledge of the topic, so my suggestions are only superficial: AustralianRupert (talk) 00:11, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

suggest expanding the lead to fully summarise the article
this sentence probably needs a citation: "Protestors, instigated by local communists and pro-Beijing business owners, ransacked Portuguese institutions ..."
as does this: "Shortly after the agreements were signed, Chinese military forces around Macau were withdrawn and the Red Guard threat had subsided."
suggest translating the non-English language titles of the sources
"Halis 2015, pp. 70–71" -- I couldn't find where the full bibliographic details of this work were provided (e.g. title etc)