Wikipedia:Peer review/Andrew Fisher/archive1

Andrew Fisher

I've worked on this article lately and was wondering what else could be done to bring this up to a GA standard? Comments appreciated. Timeshift 16:02, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Twenty Years

Yea, i think that it would definately pass GA. My only issues are with the honours section and the associated picture. The picture is awkwardly placed, and i find the section too short - the options are: merge it into another section or expand it.

There should be two sections for external links and references. 6references isnt good enough probably for GA, although the content is probably true, it just needs reliable sources to back it up.

Once these minor problems are fixed, you are looking good for GA. Maybe you should wait until the peer review of over, until GA nom-ing it. Twenty Years 04:17, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How is it all looking at the moment? :-) Timeshift 23:55, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]