Wikipedia:Peer review/Attempted assassination of Donald Trump/archive1
Appearance
Toolbox |
---|
![]() | This peer review discussion has been closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because I would like to identify any areas of improvement needed with a view to eventually working towards Good Article status.
Thanks, McPhail (talk) 23:17, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Nice article. A number of common terms such as conservative, do not need to be wikilinked.--Farang Rak Tham (talk) 16:33, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- The subject is very much a surprise to me, especially as I was reasonably attentive to the events of the 2016 election & this is the first I heard of this assassination attempt! While the numerous sources cited do enable this article to pass the Notability standard, IMHO it still feels to be a subject that does not merit the title, especially when compared to the equally unsuccessful actions of, say, Squeaky Fromme. Then again, if there are other attempts to assassinate Trump, the article title would then be used to collect all of those events under one rubric, as was done with Assassination threats against Barack Obama, none of which I was aware of. -- llywrch (talk) 17:21, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- Is it possible to expand the BBC section a bit more? It's quite small, and if it has more coverage it definitely warrants more than two sentences. Nice article though. Jdcomix (talk) 20:35, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
- Yeah this was my first reaction as well. I think if you're going to have an entire top-level section on the BBC documentary, there should be more on it than it exists -- how was it received in the US? in the UK? Who were people who worked on it? Maybe use a Template:Cite AV media to provide info on the film itself? Umimmak (talk) 09:11, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
- I think this is good: it's comprehensive, clear, succinct and well-sourced. I can't think of any changes that need making. Richard75 (talk) 10:21, 10 September 2017 (UTC)