Wikipedia:Peer review/Bong/archive1
I would like to see this as a featured article. I am curious what other people think about the article as a whole. Please leave any comments for how you think it could be improved. Triddle 20:39, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)
- The article could benefit from a history (or development) section, it doesn't say when, where, or who created the bong. In addition, inline citations are recommended. Finally, the lead section is a bit short- maybe another paragraph? Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk 22:29, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- A Bong is also colloquial for a Bengali, a resident of Bengal. =Nichalp «Talk»= 18:22, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
- The first picture is beautiful, but I think is a little confusing for the unitiated. Maybe the lead picture should be a simple, achetypal bong. You should definently keep the current picture though, because it is really nice. Maybe further down to illustrate bongs as a form of art. ike9898 June 28, 2005 21:23 (UTC)
- Considering there's only one in-line link in the whole article it almost doesn't seem worth it, but if you want this to be featured it has to employ the {{ref}} and {{note}} system. Thanks. Harro5 July 8, 2005 23:16 (UTC)
- Don't quite understand what the serial numbers are. Deryck C. 14:32, 21 July 2005 (UTC)