Wikipedia:Peer review/Christianity/archive1

Christianity

This article is the current GA collaboration. Any critique on how the article may be brought to FA status would be appreciated. Tarret 23:58, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, AZ _t 00:04, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've implemented a few of the changes, but the section titled "The trinity" I really think needs a "the" in front of it :/. Homestarmy 13:53, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is an A-class article. Do you think you could actually reference the Bible? Wiki-newbie 16:12, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunently, it seems a majority of editors feel that directly referencing the Bible alone counts as original reaserch via interpretation when dealing with anything that any churches have differences on. Homestarmy 16:46, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See my review of Computer for my thoughts on Wikipedia articles covering broad concepts.

Poorly organized.
- Does "Groups within Christianity" really belong at the top?
- Is Ecumenism properly a subtopic of Groups within Christianity?
- Does "Demographics of Christianity" deserve any mention in the main article at all?
- Do we need a section on Non-Trinitarians that is longer than the Trinity section itself?
- Are Creeds of importance equal to the concepts of Jesus, Salvation, and The Trinity?

I'll keep an eye on this peer review and make further suggestions after you have addressed these. --Ideogram 13:17, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]