Wikipedia:Peer review/Liopleurodon/archive1
Appearance
I was just wondering if anyone could give suggestions what this article needs for GA. It appears to be well cited. b_cubed 20:47, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
- Hi, will need a reshuffle; size section can be split between description (which should come after lead) and discovery and species. More references would be good too. A classification section - what it is related to etc. cheers, Cas Liber | talk | contribs 01:53, 21 May 2007 (UTC)