Wikipedia:Peer review/List of awards won by Degrassi/archive1

List of awards won by Degrassi

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for July 2008.

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because… six months ago it failed a WP:FLC. At that time, only one Awards list was Featured. A few more have been promoted since then, and I'd like to know whether the comments at the FLC still stand, or if my fellow Wikipedians' thoughts are now different.

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards won by Degrassi/archive1 is the location of the FLC.

Also, might it be better to split the article up for the different series in the franchise, or as suggested at the FLC, group them by year, or in one big table?

Thanks, Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 05:01, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from The Rambling Man (talk · contribs)
- Bold link in lead. Tut tut...
- Change your fair use link for the logo to avoid the redirect. The image doesn't appear in the redirect and I've seen bots tagging this as deletable. Which I suppose it is.
- Lose the full stop in the caption of the logo.
- Have you fiddled with the tables to try and force col widths to be the same throughout? Might look better, might look worse... have a look?
- Blank cells always trouble me, like in a large number of your "nominee" fields. Perhaps a general note would help me?
- Put (ACT) after the expanded version.
- "D:TNG" is used only once and without explanation.
- " Columbus, OH "- Ohio please.
- "First awarded in 1986, Every incarnation" - rogue cap E
- twenty-seven -> 27.
- Is there a logic to the ordering of the awards?
- "http://www.degrassi.tv" is linked quite a few times - could get this list a reputation for being a one-stop degrassi linkshop?
Hope that lot helps? The Rambling Man (talk) 16:29, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Yup. I'll make some edits later. The ordering of awards is done alphabetically, and then by year in each table. Did you look at the FLC comments? Would you agree with them (as in re-ordering by year). And would it be better to separate into each series, instead of the entire franchise? Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 17:14, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]