Wikipedia:Peer review/Mazda MX-5/archive1
This article has been through an extensive cleanup, making it narrative instead of list- and random fact-based; sections are longer, without need for sub-sections; transition from section to section is fluid; pictures and interlinks have been added throughout; superfluous technical data has been expurged; lists of colors and special editions have been spun-off to a separate article; source referencing and the external links section have been cleaned up. The section about the current-generation model could do with more content though. I've also conferred the article in other languages (except Japanese, which I don't read) and I could just find some images I would have liked to incorporate into the article but which would have to be re-uploaded (they're not in Commons but rather in their language's Special Upload sections). Please leave your comments for further improvement. --maf 17:14, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
Old Peer Review
[edit]I was reading over this article, and noticed that it has the proper structure to be a featured article, and it could become featured with some tweaking. I would like come ideas on how to improve it. Karrmann 00:40, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
- Expand lead, see WP:LEAD.
- Too many sub-sections, all too short really.
- Production figures list should be converted to prose, placed elsewhere.
- In Popular Culture also needs converting to prose.
- No footnotes, see WP:FOOTNOTE.
- See De Lorean DMC-12 for a car FA that you can use a sample to improve the Mazda MX-5 article.
— Wackymacs 06:07, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
- In Popular Culture should be excised entirely, in my opinion. Converting to prose would help keep it from just being an unmaintainable list, at least. — AKADriver ☎ 16:46, 13 June 2006 (UTC)