Wikipedia:Peer review/Philip Heselton/archive1

Philip Heselton

I've listed this article for peer review because I have just completed an expansion of the article and would appreciate some feedback, I particularly ask for this because Philip is a friend and associate and I would value third party comments on whether I have maintained a sufficiently neutral point of view.

Thanks,

Kim Dent-Brown ^{(Talk to me)} 22:12, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's quite short: can you expand on his education? DrKiernan 13:08, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to do so, and of course I have the information (or can easily get it) as I know him. The problem is that little or none of it has been published and this would therefore be original research! It may be that one of his radio interviews published on the www has this information, which would be a better source. Or of Philip himself were to post the information on the talk page, could we then include it? Kim Dent-Brown ^{(Talk to me)} 13:20, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm really not sure. I guess not, as we don't really know if it's him posting it, and/or it would be his original research! DrKiernan 13:38, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've found a helpful policy here, which indicates that non-contentious information (such as education, working life etc) can be sourced to a self-published item like a blog or website. So if I can get Philip to provide this I can then cite it and use the relevant info. Kim Dent-Brown ^{(Talk to me)} 16:58, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APR _t 11:50, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]