Wikipedia:Peer review/Pylos Combat Agate/archive1

Pylos Combat Agate

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because I would like this article to receive a grade and to learn how this article may be improved.

Thanks! BrendonTheWizard (talk) 22:22, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies for bumping, but this peer review has been open since mid-March without responses; perhaps I should have put it under the arts section instead of the history section? Brendon the Wizard ✉️ ✨ 15:19, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Update/comment - The article has been assessed and given a C class rating, so I am now wondering what steps can be taken to meet all B class criteria or higher. Thanks! Brendon the Wizard ✉️ ✨ 21:20, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's too early to improve it. Scholarship in the humanities is slow and the discovery is too recent. Thus, there is a limited amount of scientific articles on the subject and currently the article cannot by expanded further. Come back in a few years...T8612 (talk) 12:23, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, you may very well be right; most articles I'm finding when looking for more source are hundreds of days old and already cited in the article. No major manual of style concerns have been identified so far, so aside from minor edits to wording, the best we can do is either search for any notable details included in the sources but left out of the article or wait for newer developments. I'll occasionally search for newer sources, but I'm expecting the process of expanding the article to be very slow. I appreciate the edits that you along with Joe Roe have made thus far, I'll be sure to come back (but probably not for ages). Brendon the Wizard ✉️ ✨ 06:12, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]