Wikipedia:Peer review/Søren Kierkegaard/archive1

Søren Kierkegaard

I've been working on this article for several months now and I think it can use a fresh pair of eyes. I'm looking for some feedback and/or fellow editors to critique, edit, and help improve this article. Thanks! Yorick, Jester of Elsinore 08:12, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Step one: get rid of the giant ugly redundant infobox. All the information in that box should already be mentioned in the article text, much of it in the lead paragraphs, and repeating it all in a stylized box created for aesthetic reasons is unencyclopedic, as well as being useless to the people articles are actually written for: people who know little to nothing about the subject matter, not the kind of person who would understand the significance of a long list of random buzzwords and dates presented in an out-of-context box. -Silence 16:10, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The infobox can be easily be removed; it's usefulness can be debated on the ibox talk (which it seems you have already), is there anything specific to the article itself? Yorick, Jester of Elsinore 23:58, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The Infobox is neither particularly big (compare {{Music of Canada}}), nor particularly ugly, considering the lenght of the article. Circeus 08:11, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Reduce those headings!!!!! =Nichalp «Talk»= 13:59, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

the artcile is TOO LONG!! It is 79 KB. My artcile on Jeryry Fodor is 50 KB and I am being lambasted by undergrad students to keep it below 32!! cut out the fat. What do you think this is? The Stanford Encycopedia of Philophy where artciles can often be printed out on 35 pages hard copy?? Jeeesh!!--Lacatosias 09:53, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is a VERY minor point, but I noticed you double spaced after each period. It seems to be the convention on wikipedia to single space. It will likely become very difficult to maintain this style for the article as it is edited overtime. Might as well nip the problem in the butt before the formatting begins to look funny. Shaggorama 23:53, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]