Wikipedia:Peer review/Ultimate Fighting Championship/archive1

Ultimate Fighting Championship[edit]

I think this article is getting close to good article or feature article status. Within the WP:MMA project, it seems to be the best article out of the entire project, and I think getting some feedback can help us in the project concentrate on finding out what exactly it takes to elevate articles to a GA or FA status. hateless 01:17, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nice article, still room for improvement though:

"human cockfighting" in the lead does not reappear in the main body. EVERYTHING you say in the lead needs to be repeated below, or cut it out entirely.

Could use some more pics, e.g. of historical matches (1992?) or of the video games
Too many redlinks, please de-wikilink them or create new articles
"86,592 television subscribers" in 1992 needs sourcing
"Many martial artists believed that technique could overcome these size disadvantages..." (1992 section) => source plz
"Controversy and reform" is undersourced
"Evolution of the UFC rules" is unsourced

That were my 2 cents. If you could give Wikipedia:Peer_review/Wilt_Chamberlain a look, I would be happy. —Onomatopoeia 08:43, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]