Wikipedia:Picture peer review/Parviz Davoodi

Parviz Davoodi[edit]

Good quality and EV. The article lacked any pictures. Is it a worthy candidate?

Creator: Muhammad

Nominated by: Muhammad(talk) 21:16, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

I doubt it. Even at its pretty small size it's really quite unsharp. Also looks a little overexposed perhaps, but I think that could be fixed. There's nothing that striking about composition either, say, to compensate for the flaws. As a comparison, have a look at the one politician photo I have contributed. Quality is probably something similar, but I wouldn't consider nominating mine; granted yours would probably be considered higher EV due to his actual position of power, but it's not FP quality. Maybe some chance at VP. --jjron (talk) 07:33, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I have some other pictures with different composition. I will probably upload them later and list them here. A quick question; some of the pictures has the security guy being seen in the background, the politician is sharp and perfectly in focus but the guard has his head cut off. Would this be worth nominating? --Muhammad(talk) 15:15, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - Hard to say without seeing them, but I think that may impact on its chances. It may depend on how far in the background he is and how in focus he is; i.e., is he part of the scene or part of the background. --jjron (talk) 06:44, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    - I have uploaded 3 images. They are not sharpened or NR, just downsampled. Composition good of any? Or is it just VP this time --Muhammad(talk) 17:05, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      - Honest opinion - none of them do it for me. That security guy is quite prominent when he's there. I think your original assessment was correct in that the first one you put up was the best, but I've commented on that above. Just up to you what you want to do with them - I could be wrong of course! --jjron (talk) 07:42, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1
2
3

Seconder