Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2013 January 20
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < January 19 | << Dec | January | Feb >> | January 21 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
January 20[edit]
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/International Bible Lessons
I have a table with some rows in the second column wrapping. The default seems to be for other columns to be vertically aligned on center. Is there a way to make it aligned at the top without having to recreate the table in HTML? I've looked in the "Wiki Markup" entry, but couldn't find anything relative to vertical alignment.
John Hannon Prof JTH (talk) 19:49, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
- You can add a valign="top" parameter to the rows. I'm no expert on tables and haven't managed to set a single style command for the entire table at once, though. See Help:Table for Wikipedia's help page. I've re-formatted your table with this edit, making some minor changes to the first column's width and to the 2010 entry in the process.
- On an entirely unrelated note, your draft does not cite any reliable sources that are independent of the organization itself, such as news coverage. We require significant coverage in such sources, both to establish the topic's notability and to allow our readers to verify the draft's content. Huon (talk) 20:52, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
Thank you very much for your help. The "rowspan" on the table accomplished what I really wanted to do with this part. It looks much better.
John Prof JTH (talk) 15:35, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Dear sir,
I have been told that "my submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources", but without specifying the nature of the errors.
I have done changes and I want to be sure that now the article is good. My main doubts are about my external links. It seems to me that my links to Youtube aren´t welcome. My references are ok, I suppose, but I want to be entirely sure. I have been warned twice; I don´t want a third time.
Help me, please.
Thank you
Best wishes.
DonSeguro — Preceding unsigned comment added by DonSeguro (talk • contribs) 23:12, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
- The award nominations are still unsourced, but other than that, the draft looks good to me. I don't speak Spanish, though, and a native speaker might find issues with the sources that I missed - I only took a very cursory glance at their content and hope that they indeed confirm the statements they're cited for. YouTube is indeed not a reliable source, and I'd probably remove the remaining external links to specific episodes. Since we already have a link to a full list of episodes, they don't add anything relevant anyway. Huon (talk) 00:42, 21 January 2013 (UTC)