Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2014 December 7
Help desk | ||
---|---|---|
< December 6 | << Nov | December | Jan >> | December 8 > |
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
December 7
[edit]
Can you please correct as necessary? Thank you!
MauriSchembri 14:11, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
- Hello User:MauriSchembri, here at Helpdesk we provide advice on fixing articles, we don't fix them for you since likely there's nobody here who's as interested in your topic as you are. A few points of advice?
- Are you writing about yourself? If so, that's a very bad idea for a number of reasons, so I strongly advise you read our guideline WP:Autobiography for why you probably don't want to do that.
- The other problem with you article is that it's written for Schembri, not about Schembri. That is, it's written in a promotional manner, praising the subject, advertising. Wikipedia articles require you follow the guideline WP:Neutrality.
- Lastly, you don't provide any of the needed sourcing, so to make this publishable you must read WP:Notability (music) and check your draft against those sourcing guidelines.
- MatthewVanitas (talk) 14:19, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Thank you Matthew! I understand and don't worry. No big deal! Thanks again — Preceding unsigned comment added by MauriSchembri (talk • contribs) 14:29, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
I am trying to post a talk page and it's talking so much time to get approved then i do not know the reason why not approved
Abirfarid (talk) 20:48, 7 December 2014 (UTC) Abirfarid (talk) 20:48, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
- @Abirfarid: You created several copies of your draft and they were deleted because they were duplicative. Sadly, you never submitted your original draft for review, which is why no one reviewed it. I can tell you now the subject isn't notable. Writing articles for magazines doesn't make one notable. Working for a think tank doesn't make one notable. You need to make a case for notability. Chris Troutman (talk) 03:44, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
20:50:56, 7 December 2014 review of submission by Efleurantin2013
[edit]
The reviewer was not specific as to what I needed to change. He mentioned the article was more like an essay but failed to give me specific pointers as to how to make my article acceptable. It seems that the reviewer merely read the article and copied and pasted a line that he often uses for similar comments. For this review to be beneficial, it would be better to let me know what needs to be changed in order for me to do so. I'm basically asking for what I could do to make this article better and hence pass the review process. Efleurantin2013 (talk) 20:50, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
- @Efleurantin2013: The reviewer left a comment on the draft, pointing to WP:FORUM or WP:NOTHOWTO, and WP:NOTJOURNAL. Your draft is not about an encyclopedic subject; it's a how-to and it lacks in-line citations, to boot. Chris Troutman (talk) 03:35, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
I understand. Thank you for the reply. I will work to write better encyclopedic articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Efleurantin2013 (talk • contribs) 01:24, 10 December 2014 (UTC)