Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2015 September 3

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< September 2 << Aug | September | Oct >> September 4 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


September 3[edit]

06:20:57, 3 September 2015 review of submission by kanika007[edit]

I have been trying to gather the most reliable secondary sources but there are still notability issues in the draft. I need help from Wikipedia's end in order to get a solution to the above said problem and take this page live which I need to as soon as possible. Also, I need to understand how I can change the draft name from Affle India Pvt. Ltd. to Affle. Kanika007 (talk) 06:20, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kanika007: Please understand that it the information that goes on Wikipedia is only supposed to be about subjects that already have received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject of the article. Wikipedia is not designed to be used for promoting a business, and therefore probably isn't the proper venue for publishing things that need to be live "as soon as possible". If sources that meet the standards of being reliable, significant, and independent don't exist, then it may be TOOSOON for your company to have an article. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 19:32, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

08:41:25, 3 September 2015 review of submission by Niranjankanth[edit]


I JUST WANT TO KNOW WHY MY ARTICLE IS NOT ELIGIBLE TO GET POSTED. THIS IS NOT FAIR FROM YOUR SIDE. I REQUEST YOU TO GRANT MY ARTICLE MY ARTICLE TO BE PUBLISHED. Niranjankanth (talk) 08:41, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Niranjankanth: Please read the text in the pink and grey box at the top of your draft. Your article was lacking because YOURSHOPPE doesn't meet the standard of WP:CORP, which articles about businesses are required to meet. I would also suggest that you not type using all capital letters, as that is perceived as shouting and rude. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 19:36, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

10:19:39, 3 September 2015 review of submission by Mdiagouraga[edit]


Mdiagouraga (talk) 10:19, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mdiagouraga, and welcome to Wikipedia! While efforts to improve Wikipedia are always welcome, unfortunately your contributions are not written in an English that is good enough to be useful. You appear to be more familiar with French; did you know there is a French Wikipedia? You may prefer to contribute there instead. In any case, welcome to the project, and thank you for your efforts! If you need help, please feel free to notify me on my talk page. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 19:38, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour, Mdiagouraga, et bienvenue sur Wikipédia. Bien que les efforts pour améliorer Wikipédia soient toujours bienvenus, vos contributions en anglais ne sont malheureusement pas d'une qualité suffisante pour être utiles. Vous semblez être plus familier avec le français. Savez-vous qu'il existe un Wikipédia en français? Il est possible que vous préfériez contribuer à cet endroit. En tout cas, bienvenue dans le projet, et merci de vos efforts! Si vous avez besoin d'aide, vous pouvez m'en faire part sur ma page de discussion. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 19:38, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

12:04:29, 3 September 2015 review of submission by Timbits82[edit]


I'm looking for an image to go with this article but since the phenomenon is rare there are very few still images available. As the effect is not stationary, a video would be most appropriate, but I do not know how to determine copyright status or whether youtube videos are appropriate for a Wikipedia article. Advice would be appreciated...

Timbits82 (talk) 12:04, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Timbits82: Most videos on YouTube are licensed under the "Standard YouTube License", which is not compatible with Wikipedia. However, YouTube does allow video uploaders to mark their videos as licensed under "Creative Commons CC-BY 3.0". Any video licensed as such can be used on Wikipedia. To see the license on a YouTube video, click on "Show More" under the description, and the license will be shown near the very bottom of the box. Unfortunately, when I searched for "crown flash" and filtered to only creative commons files, none of the results seemed applicable to your draft. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 19:50, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Ahecht: Thanks Ahecht, that's very helpful. Can I use a still image from a video that is licensed as "Creative Commons"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Timbits82 (talk • contribs) 08:50, 4 September 2015‎ (UTC)[reply]
@Timbits82: Yes, as long as the type of CC license doesn't have "NC" (non-commercial) in the name. Also make sure that you specify the original source and author when you upload the image. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 14:02, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

18:29:25, 3 September 2015 review of submission by TCVCJ[edit]


I can't get back to my correspondence with the person who reviewed my draft! I want to edit the draft as he told me to do - but I can't find it again! And I can't remember his name! Maybe Dodger? Please help!TCVCJ (talk) 18:29, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

TCVCJ (talk) 18:29, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@TCVCJ: A list of all the pages and drafts that you have created can be found here. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 19:53, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi again TCVCJ, the discussion you're looking for is at User talk:Dodger67#14:03:11.2C 3 September 2015 review of submission by TCVCJ. If you ever lose track of something you posted just click on the ""Contributions" link in the menu at the top right of the page, you'll get a list of everything you've ever done on Wikipedia. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 20:09, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

18:35:10, 3 September 2015 review of submission by Mayerpam[edit]


Mayerpam (talk) 18:35, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Hi, I drafted an article about a new company called "Scioderm"

Then I saw that at the same time the Company Amicus Therapeutics referenced to "Scioderm" although the page had not yet been created. I am new to this and pasted in the draft and so I may have bypassed the review process even though the article was about at the 250 position in the queue for being reviewed. Should I just leave it as is. I did not mean to go live until a review since I understand this is the protocol

Thanks

It looks like this is at Draft:Scioderm and is awaiting review, which is all fine and nothing has been by-passed. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 09:05, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 18:47:51, 3 September 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Terrieditor1234[edit]


I do not know exactly what is wrong with the article I wrote, if someone can help me review and edit it, that would be great. Thank you B Terrieditor1234 (talk) 18:47, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia disapproves of autobiographies. You should at least avoid using first-person pronouns, they're quite a giveaway. And to answer your question - read the advice in the blue box inside the pink box which is the "Submission declined" notice, and follow the blue links it contains. Maproom (talk) 21:28, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

20:57:42, 3 September 2015 review of submission by TCVCJ[edit]

I have checked every <ref> for spelling and space - but the red error message still stays! Am I missing something or does it just take time? Thanks for your help!

— Preceding unsigned comment added by TCVCJ (talk • contribs) 20:57, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Fixed. You didn't use the </ref>tag to close the reference. In other words, you need to have <ref>....</ref> for the refs. Primefac (talk) 21:22, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2015_September_3&oldid=680473164"