Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2016 February 28
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < February 27 | << Jan | February | Mar >> | February 29 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
February 28[edit]
15:48:27, 28 February 2016 review of submission by Curley Wolf[edit]
- Curley Wolf (talk · contribs)
Well . . . I've exhausted all the searches that I'm aware of for information about Allan. At this point, I'd like to make a point, provide a suggestion, and seek advise. There seems to be little, if any doubt that Mr. Allan, (AKA Mr. All'e'n, & Sidney A. Pittman) was an entertainer who became the Producer for Chaino. Allan's 45rpm records can be found online, and Allan is mentioned in Billboard several times, though usually in adverts. It appears that Allan's work as an entertainer was not outstanding. What can be found about Allan's work seems to be promotional, which probably led him to choose Production, for which he was apparently much better suited. In that regard, it is somewhat difficult to find any articles about Chaino that do not also mention Allan. Allan apparently wanted to make sure that he was recognized for his production work, and Chaino seems to have been indifferent, or remained quiet about it. It 'seems' that Allan was responsible for bringing Chaino out of the 'clubs' and into the public eye. Allan's production work 'seems' impossible to deny. All this being said, I'd like to suggest that the Article about Allan be incorporated into the Article about Chaino. Thoughts? Curley Wolf (talk) 15:48, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
17:08:45, 28 February 2016 review of submission by Sunrise2016[edit]
- Sunrise2016 (talk · contribs)
When you write a biography what subtitle you put about what people say about the books of the writer and that they are used as references. thanks--Sunrise2016 (talk) 17:08, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
17:18:58, 28 February 2016 review of submission by Rebeccapeltz[edit]
- Rebeccapeltz (talk · contribs)
I am not sure what the current rejection is for. I could see that I had submitted the article incorrectly at first, but can't tell what the problem is in the rejection from
MatthewVanitas left a message on your talk page in "Your submission at Articles...".
When I click on the link in messages it takes me to the page that indicates at the top that the article was rejected because it was not submitted properly and dated the 24th. However if I go here it looks correctly submitted: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Nettie_Parrish_Martin Are there other reasons for rejection that I need to address? Where can I find these?
Thanks, Rebecca Peltz
- Hi User:Rebeccapeltz the problem was caused by your talk page being moved incorrectly. I have now restored it. User:MatthewVanitas' review is now correctly displayed on your talk page, as well as on the draft itself. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 17:44, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
21:48:45, 28 February 2016 review of submission by Seasdas[edit]
Dear Wikipedia AFC Helpdesk!
I've tried to comply with all the requirements and correct problematic issues on my draft that were brought up so far, including copyright issues ( I've received permission), better proof od notability, citations of sources, and disclosing conflict of interest. Can you please advise me what else I should do before resubmitting my draft? Many thanks: Seasdas (talk) 21:48, 28 February 2016 (UTC) Seasdas (talk) 21:48, 28 February 2016 (UTC)