Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2022 December 31
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < December 30 | << Nov | December | Jan >> | January 1 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
December 31
[edit]04:06:13, 31 December 2022 review of submission by ElevenHour
[edit]- ElevenHour (talk · contribs)
Hi, my submission got rejected for this page and there was no explanation besides the fact that "a Scott the Woz episode will never be notable". In the page there are references to both a primary and a secondary source. I don't believe the response I got originally were sufficient to reject the submission. ElevenHour (talk) 04:06, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
- @ElevenHour: while it may be a bit of a reach, especially at the first review point, it's not an entirely unreasonable assumption that an individual episode like this might be inherently non-notable. If you wish to prove otherwise, the onus is on you to produce sources that clearly demonstrate notability. Currently one (at best) such source is cited, which is not enough. (Needless to say, the close primary source counts for naught.) -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:47, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
- I don't see why a single episode of a series is not notable. Other series has pages for every episode, even when they don't have anything to say except for the plot and the reception, with the only source sometimes being reviews. I don't see why a page that has an actual source that isn't a review, should be rejected when other series gets pages when they don't have any more to say get them. So long, and thanks for all the fish (talk) 02:53, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
04:18:22, 31 December 2022 review of submission by 2603:8001:2902:64F4:7C17:B0FA:1D89:8AE7 for Draft:Los Angeles County Chair Pro Tem
[edit]I'm requesting a re-review to except the Draft:Los Angeles County Chair Pro Tem and put more sources because Draft: Los Angeles County Chair is now a page and Draft:Los Angeles County Chair Pro Tem is equal to a Mayor Pro Tem of a county Page and it needs to go up quick but im having a hard time finding independent sources. 2603:8001:2902:64F4:7C17:B0FA:1D89:8AE7 (talk) 04:18, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
- Why does it need to "go up quickly"? We're not under any deadlines here. In any case, this draft has been rejected and won't be considered again. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:41, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
- the reason why it needs to go up quickly is because Los Angeles County Chair is now a page and so we are asking for help to consider the page it needs help and needs to be summitted.
2603:8001:2902:64F4:7C17:B0FA:1D89:8AE7 (talk) 02:23, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
- Please see WP:NODEADLINE. Wikipedia's processes do not follow external deadlines, as DoubleGrazing said. David10244 (talk) 11:03, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
12:14:40, 31 December 2022 review of submission by Fsceo
[edit]
Fsceo (talk) 12:14, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
- Fsceo You don't ask a question, but I assume this is related to the draft I have placed a link to. 331dot (talk) 12:17, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
17:58:39, 31 December 2022 review of submission by RainyDayCafe
[edit]- RainyDayCafe (talk · contribs)
I intended to create a redirect page from the keyword "Stonewall Dutch" to the page Dutch Defence. However the draft was declined for being empty. Is this not allowed or did I do something wrong in creating the redirect? RainyDayCafe (talk) 17:58, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
- @RainyDayCafe: it seems the draft was incorrectly declined as a blank (which it isn't), but nevertheless correctly declined in the sense that it is a request for a redirect, and those should be created via Wikipedia:Article_wizard/Redirects. HTH, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:23, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
- @DoubleGrazing Thank you for the information! RainyDayCafe (talk) 18:25, 31 December 2022 (UTC)