Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Assessment/A-Class review/M-28 Business (Ishpeming–Negaunee, Michigan)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Promoted to A-Class. —Scott5114 ↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 04:49, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

M-28 Business (Ishpeming-Negaunee, Michigan) (4 net support votes)

Suggestion: Promote to A-Class

Nominator's comments: Looking for feedback for a potential future FAC on this article. The title does need to be moved to a version with an en dash in it, but there's an issue with redirects that will need to be solved at the same time. This will be done in the middle of this review.

Nominated by: Imzadi1979 (talk) 05:20, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Page title moved. Imzadi1979 (talk) 06:49, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Great article, route description is very detailed of surroundings, images are already at Commons. Comment - The image in the Major intersections list is a little blurry to the left. Could you request a touch-up from the Graphics Lab? This could improved the article's path to becoming FA. ~~ ĈőмρǖтέŗĠύʎ890100 (t ↔ Ĕ ↔ ώ) ^{Review me!} 16:28, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Since I'm 6 blocks from that photo, I just took a new version of it. Imzadi1979 (talk) 01:51, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - Much better. ~~ ĈĠ890100^{Review me!} 15:16, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Well-written article. - Algorerhythms (talk) 02:38, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Only a couple of comments, not worthy of opposing. But I do think you should address them, especially if you're going for FAC.
- The attitude about liking dates has recently changed, and linking dates is now discouraged unless the date is directly relevant to the article. Suggest de-linking
- It's debatable if junction "To a county route" is notable enough to mention in the infobox. For example I used to have Navajo 42 in the infobox on U.S. Route 163 it was voted down.
- The caption of the 2nd photo needs work "This is a rare sign assembly for a county road used on a state highway. In this case,...." doesn't sound encyclopedic to me. Suggest re-wording or sourcing.

Dave (talk) 02:18, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- - Dates are delinked and I've e-mailed my source at MDOT for documentation that MDOT doesn't use the local county road markers on trunklines, only the blue pentagons used in the CDH program. (CR 480 isn't a CDH.) I'll see if I can grab a copy of the MDOT Truck Operators Map tomorrow and see if it lists what I know to be true that trunkline lines and certain county roads have to be open to semi-truck traffic. I know the City of Negaunee passed an ordinance to designate that city truck route to provide a signed connector between the trunkline (BUS M-28) and the primary county road (CR 480), which is why I made it a "major junction" here. Imzadi1979 (talk) 02:31, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support Looks good to me :) --Admrb♉ltz (t • c • log) 04:13, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.