Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Peer review/Max Payne
The article has reached a point in which I no longer know how to improve it. An IP editor has done a lot to it, and would like to know whether his contributions have been helpful, but mostly I'm looking for ideas to improve it further. Anything would be helpful at this point. Larrythefunkyferret (talk) 05:29, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
Comments Just some small comments about the infobox.
- Consider using this collapsible template for the release dates, as used on Myst, {{collapsible list|title=|}}
- Being a European game the Japanese release date and the CERO rating should not need to be mentioned unless they are of importance. Salavat (talk) 05:53, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
Comments
- Before Development, the article is in bad need of sourcing. Try finding some more reviews of the game; these can actually be very helpful.
- The Gameplay section consists of several short paragraphs.
- Move the development stuff at the end of Max Payne the character to Development.
- Remove the Norse mythology section as it is unsourced and probably non-notable except for a brief mention, if you can source that.
- I understand that it is hard to find reliable development info, but the Reception and Legacy sections seem very short. For Reception, again, try finding some more reviews of the game. For Legacy, go into a bit more detail about the sequels and film using their reviews. But remove the thing about the fan-made music video as it doesn't seem notable. Tezero (talk) 17:16, 7 March 2010 (UTC)